From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [git pull request] ACPI and driver patches for 2.6.33.merge Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:45:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <86802c440912171728s27dd7108k85a0f1563660c95b@mail.gmail.com> <4B3035B0.9030303@kernel.org> <4B307C4D.501@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.9]:29842 "EHLO vms173009pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752474AbZLVTpa (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:45:30 -0500 In-reply-to: <4B307C4D.501@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Shaohua Li , Ingo Molnar , "Barnes, Jesse" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: > Len Brown wrote: > > > > Does 3563ff964fdc36358cef0330936fdac28e65142a work or fail on your system? > > I didn't ask about reverting it, I asked if it works or fails. > > i don't know. > > anything i should search in the bootlog? Please check out a branch at the commit identified above and tell us if the following issue: "it seems these three patches broke the _OSC on my intel new systems." "revert them fix the problem with AER and pciehp and etc" is present or absent on that branch. If the answer is yes, when stock 2.6.32 works, then the 3 patches between that commit and 2.6.32 are at fault. If the answer is no, yet reverting those patches helps top of tree, then the issue must be a merge conflict with other changes in 2.6.33. thanks, -Len Brown Intel Open Source Technolgy Center