From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI video: Be more liberal in validating _BQC behaviour
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:40:47 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002190140230.24628@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266357230-10602-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com>
Matthew,
Is there a life failure someplace (eg. bugzilla) that works after this
patch?
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Right now, if _BQC returns a value we don't understand we immediately
> invalidate it. Change this behaviour so we only invalidate it if it
> continues to give an invalid answer after we've already set a brightness.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/video.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> index b765790..ea314a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int acpi_video_device_lcd_set_level(struct acpi_video_device *device,
> int level);
> static int acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(
> struct acpi_video_device *device,
> - unsigned long long *level);
> + unsigned long long *level, int init);
> static int acpi_video_get_next_level(struct acpi_video_device *device,
> u32 level_current, u32 event);
> static int acpi_video_switch_brightness(struct acpi_video_device *device,
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int acpi_video_get_brightness(struct backlight_device *bd)
> struct acpi_video_device *vd =
> (struct acpi_video_device *)bl_get_data(bd);
>
> - if (acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(vd, &cur_level))
> + if (acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(vd, &cur_level, 0))
> return -EINVAL;
> for (i = 2; i < vd->brightness->count; i++) {
> if (vd->brightness->levels[i] == cur_level)
> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int video_get_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cooling_dev, unsig
> unsigned long long level;
> int offset;
>
> - if (acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(video, &level))
> + if (acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(video, &level, 0))
> return -EINVAL;
> for (offset = 2; offset < video->brightness->count; offset++)
> if (level == video->brightness->levels[offset]) {
> @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static struct dmi_system_id video_dmi_table[] __initdata = {
>
> static int
> acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(struct acpi_video_device *device,
> - unsigned long long *level)
> + unsigned long long *level, int init)
> {
> acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> int i;
> @@ -633,10 +633,16 @@ acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(struct acpi_video_device *device,
> device->brightness->curr = *level;
> return 0;
> }
> - /* BQC returned an invalid level. Stop using it. */
> - ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO, "%s returned an invalid level",
> - buf));
> - device->cap._BQC = device->cap._BCQ = 0;
> + if (!init) {
> + /*
> + * BQC returned an invalid level.
> + * Stop using it.
> + */
> + ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO,
> + "%s returned an invalid level",
> + buf));
> + device->cap._BQC = device->cap._BCQ = 0;
> + }
> } else {
> /* Fixme:
> * should we return an error or ignore this failure?
> @@ -892,7 +898,7 @@ acpi_video_init_brightness(struct acpi_video_device *device)
> if (!device->cap._BQC)
> goto set_level;
>
> - result = acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(device, &level_old);
> + result = acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(device, &level_old, 1);
> if (result)
> goto out_free_levels;
>
> @@ -903,7 +909,7 @@ acpi_video_init_brightness(struct acpi_video_device *device)
> if (result)
> goto out_free_levels;
>
> - result = acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(device, &level);
> + result = acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(device, &level, 0);
> if (result)
> goto out_free_levels;
>
> @@ -1996,7 +2002,7 @@ acpi_video_switch_brightness(struct acpi_video_device *device, int event)
> goto out;
>
> result = acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(device,
> - &level_current);
> + &level_current, 0);
> if (result)
> goto out;
>
> --
> 1.6.6.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-19 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-16 21:53 [PATCH] ACPI video: Be more liberal in validating _BQC behaviour Matthew Garrett
2010-02-19 6:40 ` Len Brown [this message]
2010-02-19 13:54 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-22 1:51 ` Zhang Rui
2010-02-22 2:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-23 6:29 ` Zhang Rui
2010-02-22 17:24 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-02-22 17:38 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1002190140230.24628@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox