From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [patch 7/7] acpi: remove old blacklist entries Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:35:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <201002022238.o12Mbx54018702@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <201002231211.54403.trenn@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]:40161 "EHLO vms173003pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934983Ab0COBPi (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:15:38 -0400 Received: from sony ([unknown] [192.102.209.1]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0KZA00CPEU5XUYW6@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:15:37 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: <201002231211.54403.trenn@suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Renninger Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, arekm@maven.pl, feng.tang@intel.com, flinco@libero.it, mad_soft@inbox.ru, mjg@redhat.com, rjw@sisk.pl On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > - { > > - .callback = force_acpi_ht, > > - .ident = "IBM eserver xSeries 330", > > - .matches = { > > - DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "IBM"), > > - DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "eserver xSeries 330"), > > - }, > > - }, > For this one I can confirm that the blacklist is not needed with latest > kernel and the BIOS I use. ... > I'd also vote to remove the blacklist for ACPI test > (does this branch get synced into linux-next)? Thanks for the verification, Thomas. Yes, this one is gone, with all the other force_acpi_ht entries. Yes, the acpi test branch is included in linux-next. cheers, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center