From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] suspend: Move NVS save/restore code to generic suspend functionality Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:11:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <1275078735-1866-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> <1275230238.14907.8.camel@maxim-laptop> <1275751718.10792.0.camel@maxim-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173011pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.11]:46460 "EHLO vms173011pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932286Ab0FJPMS (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:12:18 -0400 In-reply-to: <1275751718.10792.0.camel@maxim-laptop> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Maxim Levitsky Cc: Matthew Garrett , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alan Stern On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 15:11 -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > > Since the other patch 'ACPI / EC / PM: Fix race between EC transactions > > > and system suspend' is now merged, this should be rebased on top of it > > > (I did the opposite....) > > > > Maxim, > > Since your system needs both these fixes, and they are merged together > > in the acpi git tree, it would be great if you could test that tree > > and let me know if we got it right. > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git test > Which kernel do you expect these patches to land on? the test tree above is in linux-next now. there are some patches that will be 2.6.36 in there, but I was considereing this one for 2.6.35-rc3 -- though your e-mail with a stack trace has caused me to pause -- did I mis-merge it? thanks, -Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center