From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:47:55 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008261338230.2062@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100817155939.GA4354@sgi.com>
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Jack Steiner wrote:
> On EFI-enabled systems (like UV), the ACPI tables are already mapped as
> WB memory. This is done in the EFI function efi_enter_virtual_mode().
>
> The E820_ACPI & E820_NVS regions will be mapped as WB memory if the BIOS
> sets the WB attribute in the EFI memmap entry for the chunk of memory.
>
> The ACPI code in acpi_os_map_memory() is not currently aware of the EFI mapping
> & currently maps the memory as UC. This seems like a bug.
>
> In order to prevent attribute aliasing, I think the ACPI mapping needs to
> be consistent with the EFI mapping. Otherwise, we will have the OS
> referencing the memory as UC at the same time BIOS is referencing it as WB.
When would the firmware touch those tables after booting the OS?
We once found a Toshiba laptop where the BIOS
scribbles on the DSDT at run-time.
We presumed from this that Windows
must snapshot the tables at boot and run from a copy.
We decided not to copy the tables, but to use them in-place.
So we added a check for run-time corruption of the tables
and we've seen it fire only on that one Toshiba box
(which now boots with "acpi=copy_dsdt").
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-26 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 15:22 [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED Jack Steiner
2010-07-22 15:52 ` Len Brown
2010-07-23 16:38 ` Jack Steiner
2010-07-23 1:46 ` ykzhao
2010-07-23 7:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-23 14:26 ` ykzhao
2010-08-17 14:45 ` Jack Steiner
2010-08-17 15:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-17 14:42 ` Jack Steiner
2010-08-17 14:39 ` Jack Steiner
2010-07-24 0:14 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-07-24 0:45 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-07-24 12:26 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-08-17 14:49 ` Jack Steiner
2010-08-17 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-24 21:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-26 17:17 ` [RFC - V2] " Jack Steiner
2010-08-26 18:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-08 21:22 ` Jack Steiner
2010-12-09 1:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-09 3:50 ` Jack Steiner
2010-12-09 6:12 ` Len Brown
2010-08-17 15:59 ` [RFC] " Jack Steiner
2010-08-26 17:47 ` Len Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1008261338230.2062@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox