From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Only processor needs CPU_IDLE
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:09:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010111809180.3341@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20101010145452.72fd10e0@endymion.delvare>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]:58527 "EHLO
	vms173003pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756463Ab0JKWKO (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:10:14 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([unknown] [74.104.161.234])
 by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net
 (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009))
 with ESMTPA id <0LA500J49C8N8R54@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for
 linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:10:09 -0500 (CDT)
In-reply-to: <20101010145452.72fd10e0@endymion.delvare>
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

applied (though I'm wondering if there is a use-case
where we really notice the difference)

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center