From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [git pull request] ACPI Processor Aggregator Driver for 2.6.32-rc1 Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20091005033256.GA26592@balbir.in.ibm.com> <200910052159.24920.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:55228 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753042AbZJEU6p (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:58:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200910052159.24920.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Len Brown , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Shaohua Li , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This thing has already been merged, it appears: and it looks like a > total breakage of rules to me. Well, Len pointed out to me that the NAK is kind of pointless, since it had no constructive alternatives to the issue. So he left it in as documentation, but until the scheduler people can actually _do_ something about the problem, their voice doesn't really matter, does it? Linus