From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Make cpuidle_enable_device() call poll_idle_init() Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:01:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <201101080029.20744.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.9]:64140 "EHLO vms173009pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754960Ab1AJXBJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:01:09 -0500 In-reply-to: <201101080029.20744.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux-pm mailing list , Andrew Morton , Thomas Renninger > /** > * cpuidle_enable_device - enables idle PM for a CPU > * @dev: the CPU > @@ -176,6 +215,8 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle > ret = __cpuidle_register_device(dev); > if (ret) > return ret; > + } else { > + poll_idle_init(dev); > } how about calling poll_idle_init() unconditionally here and deleting the call to it from within __cpuidle_register_device()? thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center