From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Zimny Lech <napohybelskurwysynom2010@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] thermal: depends on NET
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:18:39 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1101120008590.19140@x980> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110110090059.6f4d739d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> > --- linux-next-20101213.orig/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> > +++ linux-next-20101213/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> >
> > menuconfig THERMAL
> > tristate "Generic Thermal sysfs driver"
> > + depends on NET
I've added this line to the offending patch.
While I agree that randconfig build testing
is theoretically useful, in recent memory
its results do not seem particularly relevant
to useful configs.
Perhaps it would be a good idea to spend some time
making non-useful configs impossible, and thus focus
the testing where it will be of more benefit?
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-12 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20101213163607.0b0a7c3a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
[not found] ` <20101213112033.d0060e6c.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
2011-01-10 17:00 ` [PATCH -next] thermal: depends on NET Randy Dunlap
2011-01-12 5:18 ` Len Brown [this message]
2011-01-12 17:48 ` on builds/randconfigs (was: [PATCH -next] thermal: depends on NET) Randy Dunlap
2011-01-12 18:35 ` Len Brown
2011-01-12 18:38 ` on builds/randconfigs Randy Dunlap
2011-01-12 21:52 ` Len Brown
2011-01-12 21:18 ` on builds/randconfigs (was: [PATCH -next] thermal: depends on NET) Andrew Morton
2011-01-12 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-01-12 21:58 ` Len Brown
2011-01-12 22:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-01-12 22:54 ` on builds/randconfigs Randy Dunlap
2011-01-13 0:44 ` on builds/randconfigs (was: [PATCH -next] thermal: depends on NET) Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-13 3:31 ` Len Brown
2011-01-13 3:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-13 3:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-13 4:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-13 12:23 ` on builds/randconfigs Michal Marek
2011-01-15 12:24 ` Vegard Nossum
2011-01-15 16:09 ` Michal Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1101120008590.19140@x980 \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=napohybelskurwysynom2010@gmail.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox