From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB8C12DDAF; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711554500; cv=none; b=dFji8geqZ7tJLIU0Qnk9TyK/J2/jL9GvFgUJ05NIGbI1ncaYopOy+lo3Lz9cG0Cu/g+4pWDFfPNTs77nescRZlhAf+MksP/VrQGJzDY5J2s+JYwVY+ziS5z0UE+2gWyu02rhpbbgE/8HMmGnwVOIxZy/LQ45znfRwt2pjiI1Qag= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711554500; c=relaxed/simple; bh=76OeUfIHMBxJhe8IVfeoWgftOWgpYR+KcvuA/0YJZ20=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=rqTv7/ooJgxXT5RnFbdb7CARfYFWZdgV8EK0SeVc0jm7bhpYBAE7PfjbZ+/Tj+FmC1IvPSSgIjhd7xkfsgkzamUsl8u0G2ORZvs1lorbP/8XW3Hdb6wwaReK5L9BH9/E9Km6gWZm69MuwxSGpPgTxiqfj5PW7mv6e7e6yxIa2cI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b=aSYnsKqT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="aSYnsKqT" Received: from [100.64.128.218] (unknown [20.29.225.195]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8344F2098E07; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:48:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 8344F2098E07 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1711554498; bh=y+2+9j6sWbPoLeSeuAktrd2FKSwR04iT4UsblobGcEo=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=aSYnsKqTNvT3v1QSZJomn1eKSsYHIkcl42F7FToV2X9hSN1YPhzZMnutZN+JOtLZ4 BHI1WG/HkmTgSbC05nsvNYmSzXJ6ozZyJEF84DOzH82F09+B9SzfnFx/lD9z2ZL6pn cd1rjP0mCGRYzc7ljxNor7ODIW35T/dLnrPOV/uI= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:48:17 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: FAILED: Patch "ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree To: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240327121738.2833692-1-sashal@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-CA From: Easwar Hariharan In-Reply-To: <20240327121738.2833692-1-sashal@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Sasha, On 3/27/2024 5:17 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: > The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > id to . > > Thanks, > Sasha > > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > >>>From 2f4a4d63a193be6fd530d180bb13c3592052904c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jarred White > Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:25:59 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory > accesses > > To align with ACPI 6.3+, since bit_width can be any 8-bit value, it > cannot be depended on to be always on a clean 8b boundary. This was > uncovered on the Cobalt 100 platform. > Please see the backport for this patch I sent earlier: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/6df99ad6-0402-4dcf-9a1c-7259436768dd@linux.microsoft.com/T/#u Thanks, Easwar