From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFAD6FA7; Sat, 3 Feb 2024 00:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706921088; cv=none; b=bMXQUDNR9OtF826hEcZ/83dxZhiwl2/LZ7LETXkBV3k5NfNPr50ZHrsFxv/mqBtcc16jOzQ/vP/isInT/kva7bIxPzV0dlQW1IgSxX+mHoL+v30Ri4Pzh9Zyxowy7c5J38eIp9fSAitYZ/47kbQ4Q77YVs8c2sgEEYcy3pVOfM4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706921088; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zUIeMJGJsDVudEVRKt5eSdSNz+XroeHA+2tekhGEG1Q=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Hgi23lwXilFqJBPA6ISY/gLo716RB+ymyyKlBZqePNUuDVzOlWviawLlqiLAPzexhbncEz5uIuCkxZ/dBARpiyRXSJwOgVSXQdcdZ0wgZq4yQjI4phF0UJ/KMZRv+u3xYfFQO+/nj+yjCC1A3pMKKJE+6WKz/X4rLXft7LJvy1s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b=Y56084aF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="Y56084aF" Received: from [10.192.9.210] (unknown [167.220.81.210]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B45BB20B2000; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:44:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com B45BB20B2000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1706921086; bh=Prii4YevyN1al6PBr0yJWiEWaRsQTGvMPZyZ2za0dn4=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Y56084aFN67h8N4285xhoYoD4TWQbWwxM7i39nvKoVgm/ao6/+x8IWPV3MXllKO3t 9+RwZSWedbMeqReg4cTbo+1Opd43PQr+lf6zXJeS8zO3YFxtkvR0eGLttl/8Obt26B bk3zIRnWOjBum+pXZfhE+XRtlhnObLVri9sokuoo= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:44:45 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] acpi: Use access_width over register_width for system memory accesses Content-Language: en-US From: Jarred White To: Easwar Hariharan , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Len Brown , "open list:ACPI" , open list References: <20231216001312.1160-1-jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com> <6e7db718-65ec-4461-bab9-0ee4c96c25eb@linux.microsoft.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, On 1/12/2024 6:19 AM, Jarred White wrote: > > Unfortunately, we have no hardware platform with this configuration to > test with. What is the level of concern here? Were there previous > changes that raised this similar concerns? > > > Thanks, > Jarred > I just wanted to follow-up on my previous questions. Thanks, Jarred