From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rakib Mullick Subject: [PATCH] acpi: Annote acpi_processor_add with __cpuinit. Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:15:24 +0600 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]:55390 "EHLO mail-px0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755361AbZJBFPV (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:15:21 -0400 Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Andrew Morton Cc: Len Brown Annote acpi_processor_add with cpuinit since it calls a cpuinit function acpi_processor_power_init and fixes a section mismatch warning. We were warned by the following warning: LD drivers/acpi/processor.o WARNING: drivers/acpi/processor.o(.text+0x1829): Section mismatch in reference from the function acpi_processor_add() to the function .cpuinit.text:acpi_processor_power_init() The function acpi_processor_add() references the function __cpuinit acpi_processor_power_init(). This is often because acpi_processor_add lacks a __cpuinit annotation or the annotation of acpi_processor_power_init is wrong. ------- Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick --- linus/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c 2009-09-28 12:04:54.000000000 +0600 +++ rakib/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c 2009-09-29 23:21:13.000000000 +0600 @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static struct notifier_block acpi_cpu_no .notifier_call = acpi_cpu_soft_notify, }; -static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device) +static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device) { struct acpi_processor *pr = NULL; int result = 0;