Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi()
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 19:51:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd254106-0d09-420c-8a56-a63d637db683@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3426078.44csPzL39Z@rafael.j.wysocki>


On 7/9/2026 8:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Rearrange acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() to make it somewhat easier to
> follow and diagnose (if need be).  In particular:
>
>   * Rename some local variables and reorder their definitions.
>
>   * Change the type of local variables used for storing firmware-provided
>     values to unsigned int (they cannot be negative).
>
>   * Eliminate local variable "loop" that is redundant.
>
>   * Avoid explicit pointer arithmetic.
>
>   * Print the correct number of _LPI state packages in the final debug
>     message.
>
> No intentional functional impact beyond debug output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
>   1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index e8682f779249..cd506e9e5a84 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -872,12 +872,12 @@ static int obj_get_integer(union acpi_object *obj, u32 *value)
>   static int acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(acpi_handle handle,
>   				       struct acpi_lpi_states_array *info)
>   {
> -	acpi_status status;
> -	int ret = 0;
> -	int pkg_count, state_idx = 1, loop;
>   	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> -	union acpi_object *lpi_data;
> +	union acpi_object *lpi_data, *lpi_pkg;
> +	unsigned int lpi_pkg_count, state_idx;
>   	struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi_state;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	int ret = 0;
>   
>   	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_LPI", NULL, &buffer);
>   	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> @@ -895,41 +895,46 @@ static int acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(acpi_handle handle,
>   		goto end;
>   	}
>   
> -	pkg_count = lpi_data->package.elements[2].integer.value;
> +	lpi_pkg_count = lpi_data->package.elements[2].integer.value;
>   
>   	/* Validate number of power states. */
> -	if (pkg_count < 1 || pkg_count != lpi_data->package.count - 3) {
> +	if (!lpi_pkg_count || lpi_pkg_count != lpi_data->package.count - 3) {
>   		acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Invalid _LPI state count\n");
>   		ret = -ENODATA;
>   		goto end;
>   	}
>   
> -	lpi_state = kzalloc_objs(*lpi_state, pkg_count);
> +	lpi_state = kzalloc_objs(*lpi_state, lpi_pkg_count);
>   	if (!lpi_state) {
>   		ret = -ENOMEM;
>   		goto end;
>   	}
>   
> -	info->size = pkg_count;
> +	info->size = lpi_pkg_count;
>   	info->entries = lpi_state;
>   
> -	/* LPI States start at index 3 */
> -	for (loop = 3; state_idx <= pkg_count; loop++, state_idx++, lpi_state++) {
> -		union acpi_object *element, *pkg_elem, *obj;
> +	/* _LPI State packages start at index 3. */
> +	lpi_pkg = &lpi_data->package.elements[3];
>   
> -		element = &lpi_data->package.elements[loop];
> -		if (element->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE || element->package.count < 7)
> +	for (state_idx = 1; state_idx <= lpi_pkg_count;
> +	     state_idx++, lpi_state++, lpi_pkg++) {
> +		union acpi_object *lpi_pkg_elem, *obj;
> +
> +		lpi_state->index = state_idx;
> +
> +		if (lpi_pkg->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE || lpi_pkg->package.count < 7)
>   			continue;
>   
> -		pkg_elem = element->package.elements;
> +		lpi_pkg_elem = lpi_pkg->package.elements;
>   
> -		obj = pkg_elem + 6;
> +		/* Get the entry method first and skip the state if that fails. */
> +		obj = &lpi_pkg_elem[6];
>   		if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
>   			struct acpi_power_register *reg;
>   
>   			if (obj->buffer.length < sizeof(*reg)) {
>   				acpi_handle_debug(handle,
> -					"Invalid register data for _LPI state %d\n",
> +					"Invalid register data for _LPI state %u\n",
>   					state_idx);
>   				continue;
>   			}
> @@ -937,7 +942,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(acpi_handle handle,
>   			reg = (struct acpi_power_register *)obj->buffer.pointer;
>   			if (reg->space_id != ACPI_ADR_SPACE_FIXED_HARDWARE) {
>   				acpi_handle_debug(handle,
> -					"Unsupported entry method for _LPI state %d\n",
> +					"Unsupported entry method for _LPI state %u\n",
>   					state_idx);
>   				continue;
>   			}
> @@ -949,36 +954,35 @@ static int acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(acpi_handle handle,
>   			lpi_state->address = obj->integer.value;
>   		} else {
>   			acpi_handle_debug(handle,
> -					  "Invalid entry method for _LPI state %d\n",
> +					  "Invalid entry method for _LPI state %u\n",
>   					  state_idx);
>   			continue;
>   		}
>   
> -		lpi_state->index = state_idx;
> -		if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 0, &lpi_state->min_residency)) {
> +		if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[0], &lpi_state->min_residency)) {
>   			acpi_handle_debug(handle,
> -					  "Assuming 10 us min. residency for _LPI state %d\n",
> +					  "Assuming 10 us min. residency for _LPI state %u\n",
>   					  state_idx);
>   			lpi_state->min_residency = 10;
>   		}
>   
> -		if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 1, &lpi_state->wake_latency)) {
> +		if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[1], &lpi_state->wake_latency)) {
>   			acpi_handle_debug(handle,
> -					  "Assuming 10 us wake latency for _LPI state %d\n",
> +					  "Assuming 10 us wake latency for _LPI state %u\n",
>   					  state_idx);
>   			lpi_state->wake_latency = 10;
>   		}
>   
> -		if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 2, &lpi_state->flags))
> +		if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[2], &lpi_state->flags))
>   			lpi_state->flags = 0;
>   
> -		if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 3, &lpi_state->arch_flags))
> +		if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[3], &lpi_state->arch_flags))
>   			lpi_state->arch_flags = 0;
>   
> -		if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 4, &lpi_state->res_cnt_freq))
> +		if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[4], &lpi_state->res_cnt_freq))
>   			lpi_state->res_cnt_freq = 1;
>   
> -		if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 5, &lpi_state->enable_parent_state))
> +		if (obj_get_integer(&lpi_pkg_elem[5], &lpi_state->enable_parent_state))
>   			lpi_state->enable_parent_state = 0;
How about move parsing lpi_pkg_elem[6] code to here?
>   
>   		/* Skip elements [7-8] i.e. Residency/Usage counters. */
> @@ -987,16 +991,16 @@ static int acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(acpi_handle handle,
>   		 * Avoid out-of-bounds access if the size of the package is less
>   		 * than expected.
>   		 */
> -		if (element->package.count < 10)
> +		if (lpi_pkg->package.count < 10)
>   			continue;
>   
> -		obj = pkg_elem + 9;
> +		obj = &lpi_pkg_elem[9];
>   		if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_STRING)
>   			strscpy(lpi_state->desc, obj->string.pointer,
>   				ACPI_CX_DESC_LEN);
>   	}
>   
> -	acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Found %d power states\n", state_idx);
> +	acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Found %u power states\n", lpi_pkg_count);
>   end:
>   	kfree(buffer.pointer);
>   	return ret;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-16 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 12:29 [PATCH v1 00/17] ACPI: processor: idle/intel_idle: Add ACPI _LPI support to intel_idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 01/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Expand _LPI package sanity checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 11:22   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-16  9:05   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v1 02/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Ignore _LPI states with SYSTEMIO entry method Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 11:24   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-16  9:08   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:32 ` [PATCH v1 03/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Unify debug in acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 11:27   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-16  9:16   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:33 ` [PATCH v1 04/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 11:29   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-16  9:46   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-16 10:36     ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-07-16 11:51   ` lihuisong (C) [this message]
2026-07-16 12:57     ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-07-09 12:34 ` [PATCH v1 05/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Split acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 13:17   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-16 11:55   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-16 12:58     ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-07-17  2:04       ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:35 ` [PATCH v1 06/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce lpi_state_debug() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:36 ` [PATCH v1 07/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 13:18   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-16 12:06   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v1 08/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework first-level _LPI states processing Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 13:20   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-16 12:44   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-16 13:03     ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v1 09/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Drop redundant _LPI presence checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 13:21   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-16 12:47   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:38 ` [PATCH v1 10/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange loop in acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 13:21   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-16 12:49   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 11/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework flatten_lpi_states() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 13:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-17  1:36   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 12/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce too_many_states() for _LPI Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 13:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-17  1:38   ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:40 ` [PATCH v1 13/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 13:32   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-17  1:46     ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:41 ` [PATCH v1 14/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Relocate acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 13:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-17  1:56     ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v1 15/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Add switch for strict _LPI processing Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 13:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-17  1:58     ` lihuisong (C)
2026-07-09 12:43 ` [PATCH v1 16/17] intel_idle: Prepare for adding ACPI _LPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:44 ` [PATCH v1 17/17] intel_idle: Add " Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-13 14:56   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-07-14 13:25     ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bd254106-0d09-420c-8a56-a63d637db683@huawei.com \
    --to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox