From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: Use NULL from Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:15:13 -0800 Message-ID: References: <4f698429-49cf-689a-9eb5-978b182bb4bb@sandisk.com> <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E37E523C92@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-sn1nam02on0061.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.36.61]:19520 "EHLO NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932995AbcKPRaJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:30:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E37E523C92@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Moore, Robert" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Zheng, Lv" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" On 11/16/2016 09:08 AM, Moore, Robert wrote: > What is the point of these changes? What's the point of redefining NULL? What's the point of casting a void pointer to void *? Bart.