From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85445C433B4 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CC46121E for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345264AbhDGOqa (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:46:30 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:30187 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244998AbhDGOq2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:46:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1617806778; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mg+fAs8HiCSf9usDBnxdCzvZm/dqxv2o27VRQ8dpGpE=; b=jPKzwiE/9AoSGrNd6RS6OlZy9VUmoO3MiNoeuBRWjLsQ+vNITic18iddsbp42livXzPLHo p1Pc7bJNBdgyFQeDatDNH8efOGixIhiZmVVV2L1PS9QCoPCjGo2ANNIB6CfCkUarzS6jxd wbmegmsLEDUPPfXB0/4LjcupsH2YUuM= Received: from mail-ej1-f69.google.com (mail-ej1-f69.google.com [209.85.218.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-209-gDW4DfkzNLapO_dRws_m8Q-1; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 10:46:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gDW4DfkzNLapO_dRws_m8Q-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f69.google.com with SMTP id zn19so3093228ejb.14 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 07:46:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mg+fAs8HiCSf9usDBnxdCzvZm/dqxv2o27VRQ8dpGpE=; b=bIdsby+DzBoDloK46W6shhOF9iWeuL9Gz0yqVDIQnT1WB5dzMwnRaxZEEPM7EwQI1D SPLL0i71+lKchvb0fiLzrVRWty7y2NT5PvFcK5lEPpaiIX5u/j6iXrAvtZn6mImXVy+D C5uTvUT7ONNVA29nwJczhp7Gsm1MbOYszw1zkDjPReZpVR0NdDWhZpR9lK8TOCTPDF+c jL5tFaNfGyTM36e3xN6JXMGvX5BpVre9P8ViuQ2hgv8du/o/cW3E9zB39JYx1UMW+XQD feaPIQSb7h5STXzosxdsVtR07Q7dOjVKUWS4xFbKKogFOW9bFPSI9Cw+uqxRWbotAMxE 9ZHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530W9bSXF5zGiU02rAnu61p2y8bcu8vermbbQXafG9+BsJC4kS2T yCiCb37xPr4pTA8x3sHbDewuk7t3q+hsDYtet1sH6Wm2xi9OdhCpmpm9khQ6DzM5ON72O/y9KRW kz+saWHw9OnLBCJjLYKRJow== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:628a:: with SMTP id nd10mr4143793ejc.326.1617806775283; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzHhBqm26Mm7YFhs88gM9OOeiQCRSbPAmpao8DVnIAjK0sCenydd7fdhGuJ2WWq8h5whHoFsw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:628a:: with SMTP id nd10mr4143783ejc.326.1617806775169; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1.localdomain (2001-1c00-0c1e-bf00-1054-9d19-e0f0-8214.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c1e:bf00:1054:9d19:e0f0:8214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x17sm12698028ejd.68.2021.04.07.07.46.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Apr 2021 07:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] ACPI: scan: acpi_bus_check_add() simplifications To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux ACPI Cc: LKML References: <2192169.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher> From: Hans de Goede Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:46:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2192169.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 4/7/21 4:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > This series simplifies acpi_bus_check_add() and related code. > > It mostly is not expected to alter functionality, except for patch [4/5] that > unifies the handling of device and processor objects. > > Please refer to the patch changelogs for details. Thanks, the entire series looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Regards, Hans