From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sinan Kaya Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI/ACPI: allow ACPI to be built without PCI support Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:03:37 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20181208214644.5374-1-okaya@kernel.org> <20181208214644.5374-3-okaya@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Bjorn Helgaas , Robert Moore , "Schmauss, Erik" , Jan Kiszka , otavio.pontes@intel.com, Christian Koenig , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 12/9/2018 1:20 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI >> struct pci_dev *acpi_get_pci_dev(acpi_handle); >> +#else >> +static inline struct pci_dev *acpi_get_pci_dev(acpi_handle hndl) > Can you spell handle fully? > Yeah, I can do that.