From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC1C0523B for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 07:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD325F5 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 00:26:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-32157c8e4c7so12437016f8f.1 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 00:26:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1695885959; x=1696490759; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=T1zwWE6Tost6V2Eimgm6IgNYAgd+hKcAiIDviQJCo6E=; b=hBEO0Qf35J+tTJgnRfqtX/HxPN3UIK5PP3YarmZBEUgw+X0Pg0dkhStX7gy46PkcEG 2ic5SZok8tGlsq11+0Mq5W7GijQawVmQ2AVXq8kIkKkCDqndMOlnV2me6E4sXrFbA3BO WknLNgm+OghhsD5KGBuPG00uVGDpwTMPEs5GCTbXggX5goVVCK5OXHLweB9jGd9FCM9T kw+pHPxLYWJ0YE0iXss5y3JTapAl4EeGxS0CofFAauFSmPW9QMQ1pC0G7asL7SIuZ99h POzVD1czZgOJKiOcR5XbE2zTyipmweOb9xujeAvhUwh1gCLjAtf+yaws5ZjEni7Mr3Y8 EcwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695885959; x=1696490759; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=T1zwWE6Tost6V2Eimgm6IgNYAgd+hKcAiIDviQJCo6E=; b=DApuISkwD73qD7i8SqjZhgZxydCbbBQTNmExwXibv5As9AZjSGcY8WynlGC7B67B4p 9z0936uZHRb/t6aGbhsHqWvp5DLuW67lsjz7IUaAQfbvENGZe9GMN7RzApGv8ktMpcyY 1YfqPiFiXrNFtUjUW5GncDYd89PtriuGV+gaiHbU5VwX1adunPwePwibLjTjFHdTQvAd kLbnC/34NufO0LcRaHRdOmg6BcBCunIMb1kr3vGU4uWDdzaoxNiejJTAXAvAa0GKiDB5 P/6/6eKDOf0I2Qg4DNIKJ3LUgYwD5gp0q9yK8jboLaAHnMkV4fhGrr69ejMpqIfeOFG3 dOaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyITOeGD4WQ9tOZOx83pB3SVke93YrvZ1ThXkopQcNa5A9CFUnf GvWMzVHng1U/d5rwr69BWx9mAw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHtrtemWZL7OawPII6sSb2oZ6RkKjIwpNwqwDPXFEsITB3M9/Sz3GFCs24Sxx/kqqIzQZV2Ig== X-Received: by 2002:adf:d0cc:0:b0:31d:da10:e471 with SMTP id z12-20020adfd0cc000000b0031dda10e471mr436228wrh.69.1695885958905; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 00:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a05:6e02:1041:c10:c49e:e1a5:3210:b8c0? ([2a05:6e02:1041:c10:c49e:e1a5:3210:b8c0]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w10-20020adfd4ca000000b0031762e89f94sm18629720wrk.117.2023.09.28.00.25.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Sep 2023 00:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:25:57 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/13] ACPI: thermal: Drop critical_valid and hot_valid trip flags Content-Language: en-US To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM Cc: LKML , Linux ACPI , Srinivas Pandruvada , Zhang Rui , Lukasz Luba , "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <1957441.PYKUYFuaPT@kreacher> <2375603.NG923GbCHz@kreacher> From: Daniel Lezcano In-Reply-To: <2375603.NG923GbCHz@kreacher> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On 21/09/2023 20:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > The critical_valid and hot_valid flags in struct acpi_thermal_trips are > only used during initialization and they are only false if the > corresponding trip temperatures are equal to THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID, so > drop them and use THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID checks instead of them where > applicable. > > No intentional functional impact. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > --- Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog