* [PATCH v2] ACPI: video: Fix use-after-free in acpi_video_switch_brightness()
@ 2025-10-22 4:25 Yuhao Jiang
2025-10-22 9:28 ` Hans de Goede
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yuhao Jiang @ 2025-10-22 4:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J . Wysocki
Cc: Len Brown, Hans de Goede, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, stable,
Yuhao Jiang
The switch_brightness_work delayed work accesses device->brightness
and device->backlight, which are freed by
acpi_video_dev_unregister_backlight() during device removal.
If the work executes after acpi_video_bus_unregister_backlight()
frees these resources, it causes a use-after-free when
acpi_video_switch_brightness() dereferences device->brightness or
device->backlight.
Fix this by calling cancel_delayed_work_sync() for each device's
switch_brightness_work before unregistering its backlight resources.
This ensures the work completes before the memory is freed.
Fixes: 8ab58e8e7e097 ("ACPI / video: Fix backlight taking 2 steps on a brightness up/down keypress")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Move cancel_delayed_work_sync() to acpi_video_bus_unregister_backlight()
instead of acpi_video_bus_put_devices() for better logic clarity and to
prevent potential UAF of device->brightness
- Correct Fixes tag to point to 8ab58e8e7e097 which introduced the delayed work
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251022040859.2102914-1-danisjiang@gmail.com
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
index 103f29661576..64709658bdc4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
@@ -1869,8 +1869,10 @@ static int acpi_video_bus_unregister_backlight(struct acpi_video_bus *video)
error = unregister_pm_notifier(&video->pm_nb);
mutex_lock(&video->device_list_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(dev, &video->video_device_list, entry)
+ list_for_each_entry(dev, &video->video_device_list, entry) {
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->switch_brightness_work);
acpi_video_dev_unregister_backlight(dev);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&video->device_list_lock);
video->backlight_registered = false;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: video: Fix use-after-free in acpi_video_switch_brightness()
2025-10-22 4:25 [PATCH v2] ACPI: video: Fix use-after-free in acpi_video_switch_brightness() Yuhao Jiang
@ 2025-10-22 9:28 ` Hans de Goede
2025-10-22 20:10 ` Yuhao Jiang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2025-10-22 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuhao Jiang, Rafael J . Wysocki
Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, stable
Hi Yuhao,
On 22-Oct-25 6:25 AM, Yuhao Jiang wrote:
> The switch_brightness_work delayed work accesses device->brightness
> and device->backlight, which are freed by
> acpi_video_dev_unregister_backlight() during device removal.
>
> If the work executes after acpi_video_bus_unregister_backlight()
> frees these resources, it causes a use-after-free when
> acpi_video_switch_brightness() dereferences device->brightness or
> device->backlight.
>
> Fix this by calling cancel_delayed_work_sync() for each device's
> switch_brightness_work before unregistering its backlight resources.
> This ensures the work completes before the memory is freed.
>
> Fixes: 8ab58e8e7e097 ("ACPI / video: Fix backlight taking 2 steps on a brightness up/down keypress")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>
Thank you for your patch, this is a good catch.
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Move cancel_delayed_work_sync() to acpi_video_bus_unregister_backlight()
> instead of acpi_video_bus_put_devices() for better logic clarity and to
> prevent potential UAF of device->brightness
> - Correct Fixes tag to point to 8ab58e8e7e097 which introduced the delayed work
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251022040859.2102914-1-danisjiang@gmail.com
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> index 103f29661576..64709658bdc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> @@ -1869,8 +1869,10 @@ static int acpi_video_bus_unregister_backlight(struct acpi_video_bus *video)
> error = unregister_pm_notifier(&video->pm_nb);
>
> mutex_lock(&video->device_list_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(dev, &video->video_device_list, entry)
> + list_for_each_entry(dev, &video->video_device_list, entry) {
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->switch_brightness_work);
> acpi_video_dev_unregister_backlight(dev);
> + }
> mutex_unlock(&video->device_list_lock);
>
> video->backlight_registered = false;
As you mention in your changelog, the cancel_delayed_work_sync() needs
to happen before acpi_video_dev_unregister_backlight().
Since this needs to happen before unregistering things I think it would be
more logical to put the cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->switch_brightness_work);
call inside acpi_video_bus_remove_notify_handler().
So do the cancel in the loop there, directly after the
acpi_video_dev_remove_notify_handler(dev) call which removes the handler
which queues the work.
E.g. make the loop inside acpi_video_bus_remove_notify_handler() look like
this:
mutex_lock(&video->device_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(dev, &video->video_device_list, entry) {
acpi_video_dev_remove_notify_handler(dev);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->switch_brightness_work);
}
mutex_unlock(&video->device_list_lock);
This cancels the work a bit earlier, but more importantly this feels
like the more logical place to put the cancel call.
Regards,
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: video: Fix use-after-free in acpi_video_switch_brightness()
2025-10-22 9:28 ` Hans de Goede
@ 2025-10-22 20:10 ` Yuhao Jiang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yuhao Jiang @ 2025-10-22 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans de Goede
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, stable
Hi Hans,
Thanks for the feedback! I've submitted it in patch v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251022200704.2655507-1-danisjiang@gmail.com/.
Best regards,
Yuhao
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 4:28 AM Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Yuhao,
>
> On 22-Oct-25 6:25 AM, Yuhao Jiang wrote:
> > The switch_brightness_work delayed work accesses device->brightness
> > and device->backlight, which are freed by
> > acpi_video_dev_unregister_backlight() during device removal.
> >
> > If the work executes after acpi_video_bus_unregister_backlight()
> > frees these resources, it causes a use-after-free when
> > acpi_video_switch_brightness() dereferences device->brightness or
> > device->backlight.
> >
> > Fix this by calling cancel_delayed_work_sync() for each device's
> > switch_brightness_work before unregistering its backlight resources.
> > This ensures the work completes before the memory is freed.
> >
> > Fixes: 8ab58e8e7e097 ("ACPI / video: Fix backlight taking 2 steps on a brightness up/down keypress")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your patch, this is a good catch.
>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Move cancel_delayed_work_sync() to acpi_video_bus_unregister_backlight()
> > instead of acpi_video_bus_put_devices() for better logic clarity and to
> > prevent potential UAF of device->brightness
> > - Correct Fixes tag to point to 8ab58e8e7e097 which introduced the delayed work
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251022040859.2102914-1-danisjiang@gmail.com
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> > index 103f29661576..64709658bdc4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> > @@ -1869,8 +1869,10 @@ static int acpi_video_bus_unregister_backlight(struct acpi_video_bus *video)
> > error = unregister_pm_notifier(&video->pm_nb);
> >
> > mutex_lock(&video->device_list_lock);
> > - list_for_each_entry(dev, &video->video_device_list, entry)
> > + list_for_each_entry(dev, &video->video_device_list, entry) {
> > + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->switch_brightness_work);
> > acpi_video_dev_unregister_backlight(dev);
> > + }
> > mutex_unlock(&video->device_list_lock);
> >
> > video->backlight_registered = false;
>
> As you mention in your changelog, the cancel_delayed_work_sync() needs
> to happen before acpi_video_dev_unregister_backlight().
>
> Since this needs to happen before unregistering things I think it would be
> more logical to put the cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->switch_brightness_work);
> call inside acpi_video_bus_remove_notify_handler().
>
> So do the cancel in the loop there, directly after the
> acpi_video_dev_remove_notify_handler(dev) call which removes the handler
> which queues the work.
>
> E.g. make the loop inside acpi_video_bus_remove_notify_handler() look like
> this:
>
> mutex_lock(&video->device_list_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &video->video_device_list, entry) {
> acpi_video_dev_remove_notify_handler(dev);
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->switch_brightness_work);
> }
> mutex_unlock(&video->device_list_lock);
>
> This cancels the work a bit earlier, but more importantly this feels
> like the more logical place to put the cancel call.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-22 20:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-22 4:25 [PATCH v2] ACPI: video: Fix use-after-free in acpi_video_switch_brightness() Yuhao Jiang
2025-10-22 9:28 ` Hans de Goede
2025-10-22 20:10 ` Yuhao Jiang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox