From: Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: processor_perflib: Do not send _PPC change notification if not ready
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 10:26:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d71a6cf7352de5595ac1419000bd72b6d068cce1.1517192577.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com> (raw)
The following warning was triggered after resumed from S3 -
if all the nonboot CPUs were put offline before suspend:
[ 1840.329515] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x771 at rIP: 0xffffffff86061e3a (native_read_msr+0xa/0x30)
[ 1840.329516] Call Trace:
[ 1840.329521] __rdmsr_on_cpu+0x33/0x50
[ 1840.329525] generic_exec_single+0x81/0xb0
[ 1840.329527] smp_call_function_single+0xd2/0x100
[ 1840.329530] ? acpi_ds_result_pop+0xdd/0xf2
[ 1840.329532] ? acpi_ds_create_operand+0x215/0x23c
[ 1840.329534] rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80
[ 1840.329536] ? cpumask_next+0x1b/0x20
[ 1840.329538] ? rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80
[ 1840.329541] intel_pstate_update_perf_limits+0xf3/0x220
[ 1840.329544] ? notifier_call_chain+0x4a/0x70
[ 1840.329546] intel_pstate_set_policy+0x4e/0x150
[ 1840.329548] cpufreq_set_policy+0xcd/0x2f0
[ 1840.329550] cpufreq_update_policy+0xb2/0x130
[ 1840.329552] ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x130/0x130
[ 1840.329556] acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed+0x65/0x80
[ 1840.329558] acpi_processor_notify+0x80/0x100
[ 1840.329561] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x44/0x5c
[ 1840.329563] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x14/0x20
[ 1840.329565] process_one_work+0x193/0x3c0
[ 1840.329567] worker_thread+0x35/0x3b0
[ 1840.329569] kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 1840.329571] ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
[ 1840.329572] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[ 1840.329575] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x180
[ 1840.329577] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
[ 1840.329585] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x774 (tried to write 0x0000000000000000) at rIP: 0xffffffff86061f78 (native_write_msr+0x8/0x30)
[ 1840.329586] Call Trace:
[ 1840.329587] __wrmsr_on_cpu+0x37/0x40
[ 1840.329589] generic_exec_single+0x81/0xb0
[ 1840.329592] smp_call_function_single+0xd2/0x100
[ 1840.329594] ? acpi_ds_create_operand+0x215/0x23c
[ 1840.329595] ? cpumask_next+0x1b/0x20
[ 1840.329597] wrmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x70
[ 1840.329598] ? rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80
[ 1840.329599] ? wrmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x70
[ 1840.329602] intel_pstate_hwp_set+0xd3/0x150
[ 1840.329604] intel_pstate_set_policy+0x119/0x150
[ 1840.329606] cpufreq_set_policy+0xcd/0x2f0
[ 1840.329607] cpufreq_update_policy+0xb2/0x130
[ 1840.329610] ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x130/0x130
[ 1840.329613] acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed+0x65/0x80
[ 1840.329615] acpi_processor_notify+0x80/0x100
[ 1840.329617] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x44/0x5c
[ 1840.329619] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x14/0x20
[ 1840.329620] process_one_work+0x193/0x3c0
[ 1840.329622] worker_thread+0x35/0x3b0
[ 1840.329624] kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 1840.329625] ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
[ 1840.329626] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[ 1840.329628] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x180
[ 1840.329631] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
This is because if there's only one online CPU, the MSR_PM_ENABLE
(package wide)can not be enabled after resumed, due to
intel_pstate_hwp_enable() will only be invoked on AP's online
process after resumed - if there's no AP online, the HWP remains
disabled after resumed (BIOS has disabled it in S3). Then if
there comes a _PPC change notification which touches HWP register
during this stage, the warning is triggered.
Since we don't call acpi_processor_register_performance() when
HWP is enabled, the pr->performance will be NULL. When this is
NULL we don't need to do _PPC change notification.
Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 18b72eec3507..c7cf48ad5cb9 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ void acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr, int event_flag)
{
int ret;
- if (ignore_ppc) {
+ if (ignore_ppc || !pr->performance) {
/*
* Only when it is notification event, the _OST object
* will be evaluated. Otherwise it is skipped.
--
2.13.6
next reply other threads:[~2018-01-29 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-29 2:26 Yu Chen [this message]
2018-02-08 9:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: processor_perflib: Do not send _PPC change notification if not ready Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d71a6cf7352de5595ac1419000bd72b6d068cce1.1517192577.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).