public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, yazen.ghannam@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] CXL, PCIE: Add cxl_rcrb_addr file to dport_dev
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:49:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d96177aa-52ca-2015-7cb1-8d0a237b43fc@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230912151112.00007fe2@Huawei.com>

Hi Jonathan, thanks for the review. Responses inline.

On 9/12/23 9:11 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 14:19:54 -0500
> Ben Cheatham <Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com> wrote:
> 
>> Add cxl_rcrb_addr to the dport_dev (normally represented by a pcie
>> device) for CXL RCH root ports. The file will print the RCRB base
>> MMIO address of the root port when read and will be used by
>> users looking to inject CXL EINJ error types for RCH hosts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Cheatham <Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com>
> 
> Can we use is_visble to control presence of the attribute rather than
> race condition special that is dynamic addition of a sysfs file.
> 

Yeah, I'll go ahead and change it. Not sure why I did it that way to be
honest.

> You are adding the file to the linked device which is a bit odd.
> Why there rather than in the portX?
> 

I agree it's a bit odd. I went with adding the file to the linked device
because the ACPI spec specifies using downstream ports for EINJ. The
alternative was to have a file for each dport under portX (i.e. dportY_rcrb_addr)
which seemed messier to me. Now that I think about it though, I could just
have a single file under portX that you write the dport name/number to and
it returns the rcrb address. Let me know if you think that would be better.

> I'd also normally expect the docs to call out the non-link path for that
> device which is somewhere in the PCI topology I think.
> 

Yeah that makes sense, I'll go ahead and change that.

>> ---
>>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cxl |  8 ++++++
>>  drivers/cxl/acpi.c                      |  2 ++
>>  drivers/cxl/core/port.c                 | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/cxl/cxl.h                       |  2 ++
>>  4 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cxl b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cxl
>> index 087f762ebfd5..a7d169235543 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cxl
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cxl
>> @@ -177,6 +177,14 @@ Description:
>>  		integer reflects the hardware port unique-id used in the
>>  		hardware decoder target list.
>>  
>> +What:		/sys/bus/cxl/devices/portX/dportY/cxl_rcrb_addr
>> +Date:		August, 2023
>> +KernelVersion:	v6.6
>> +Contact:	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
>> +Description:
>> +		(RO) The 'cxl_rcrb_addr' device file gives the MMIO base address
>> +		of the RCRB of the corresponding CXL 1.1 downstream port. Only
>> +		present for CXL 1.1 dports.
>>  
>>  What:		/sys/bus/cxl/devices/decoderX.Y
>>  Date:		June, 2021
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
>> index d1c559879dcc..3e2ca946bf47 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
>> @@ -676,6 +676,8 @@ static int cxl_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	if (IS_ERR(root_port))
>>  		return PTR_ERR(root_port);
>>  
>> +	set_cxl_root(root_port);
>> +
>>  	rc = bus_for_each_dev(adev->dev.bus, NULL, root_port,
>>  			      add_host_bridge_dport);
>>  	if (rc < 0)
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
>> index 724be8448eb4..001ab8742e21 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
>> @@ -875,6 +875,14 @@ struct cxl_port *find_cxl_root(struct cxl_port *port)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(find_cxl_root, CXL);
>>  
>> +static struct cxl_port *cxl_root;
>> +
>> +void set_cxl_root(struct cxl_port *root_port)
>> +{
>> +	cxl_root = root_port;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(set_cxl_root, CXL);
>> +
>>  static struct cxl_dport *find_dport(struct cxl_port *port, int id)
>>  {
>>  	struct cxl_dport *dport;
>> @@ -930,11 +938,30 @@ static void cond_cxl_root_unlock(struct cxl_port *port)
>>  		device_unlock(&port->dev);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static ssize_t cxl_rcrb_addr_show(struct device *dev,
>> +				  struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct cxl_dport *dport;
>> +
>> +	if (!cxl_root)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	dport = cxl_find_dport_by_dev(cxl_root, dev);
>> +	if (!dport)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%llx\n", (u64) dport->rcrb.base);
>> +}
>> +DEVICE_ATTR_RO(cxl_rcrb_addr);
>> +
>>  static void cxl_dport_remove(void *data)
>>  {
>>  	struct cxl_dport *dport = data;
>>  	struct cxl_port *port = dport->port;
>>  
>> +	if (dport->rch)
>> +		device_remove_file(dport->dport_dev, &dev_attr_cxl_rcrb_addr);
>> +
>>  	xa_erase(&port->dports, (unsigned long) dport->dport_dev);
>>  	put_device(dport->dport_dev);
>>  }
>> @@ -1021,6 +1048,12 @@ __devm_cxl_add_dport(struct cxl_port *port, struct device *dport_dev,
>>  	if (rc)
>>  		return ERR_PTR(rc);
>>  
>> +	if (dport->rch && dport->rcrb.base != CXL_RESOURCE_NONE) {
>> +		rc = device_create_file(dport_dev, &dev_attr_cxl_rcrb_addr);
>> +		if (rc)
>> +			return ERR_PTR(rc);
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	return dport;
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>> index 76d92561af29..4d5bce4bae7e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>> @@ -690,6 +690,8 @@ struct cxl_port *devm_cxl_add_port(struct device *host,
>>  				   resource_size_t component_reg_phys,
>>  				   struct cxl_dport *parent_dport);
>>  struct cxl_port *find_cxl_root(struct cxl_port *port);
>> +void set_cxl_root(struct cxl_port *root_port);
>> +
>>  int devm_cxl_enumerate_ports(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd);
>>  void cxl_bus_rescan(void);
>>  void cxl_bus_drain(void);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-12 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-07 19:19 [PATCH v4 0/3] CXL, ACPI, APEI, EINJ: Update EINJ for CXL 1.1 error types Ben Cheatham
2023-09-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] CXL, PCIE: Add cxl_rcrb_addr file to dport_dev Ben Cheatham
2023-09-12 14:11   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-12 14:49     ` Ben Cheatham [this message]
2023-09-12 16:33       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ACPI, APEI, EINJ: Add CXL 1.1 EINJ error type support Ben Cheatham
2023-09-12 14:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-12 14:49     ` Ben Cheatham
2023-09-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ACPI, APEI, EINJ: Update EINJ documentation Ben Cheatham
2023-09-12 13:51   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d96177aa-52ca-2015-7cb1-8d0a237b43fc@amd.com \
    --to=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox