From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev, lenb@kernel.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, robert.moore@intel.com,
rafael@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com,
jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com,
lihuisong@huawei.com, hepeng68@huawei.com, fanghao11@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] ACPI: CPPC: Add autonomous selection ABIs
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:38:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6650141-85cb-450d-ab62-0c2bea8ff1da@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e581fa05-9b4e-46e6-9172-83704bfa8ab2@arm.com>
On 12/17/2024 07:48, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> Hello Lifeng, Huang, Gautham, Mario,
>
> On 12/16/24 10:16, Lifeng Zheng wrote:
>> cppc_set_epp - write energy performance preference register
>>
>> cppc_get_auto_act_window - read autonomous activity window register
>>
>> cppc_set_auto_act_window - write autonomous activity window register
>>
>> cppc_get_auto_sel - read autonomous selection enable register
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>> index 83c7fcad74ad..645f2366c888 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>> @@ -1595,6 +1595,50 @@ int cppc_set_epp_perf(int cpu, struct
>> cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls, bool enable)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_epp_perf);
>> +/**
>> + * cppc_set_epp() - Write the EPP register.
>> + * @cpu: CPU on which to write register.
>> + * @epp_val: Value to write to the EPP register.
>> + */
>> +int cppc_set_epp(int cpu, u64 epp_val)
>> +{
>> + return cppc_set_reg_val(cpu, ENERGY_PERF, epp_val);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_epp);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * cppc_get_auto_act_window() - Read autonomous activity window
>> register.
>> + * @cpu: CPU from which to read register.
>> + * @auto_act_window: Return address.
>> + */
>> +int cppc_get_auto_act_window(int cpu, u64 *auto_act_window)
>
> As there is only one way to interpret the value of the
> 'Autonomous Activity Window Register', maybe the logic to convert
> from/to the register value to a value in us should be placed here
> rather than in the cppc_cpufreq driver.
> Meaning, maybe the prototype should be:
>
> int cppc_get_auto_act_window(int cpu, unsigned int *auto_act_window);
>
> Similar remark for cppc_set_epp() and other functions.
>
>> +{
>> + return cppc_get_reg_val(cpu, AUTO_ACT_WINDOW, auto_act_window);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_get_auto_act_window);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * cppc_set_auto_act_window() - Write autonomous activity window
>> register.
>> + * @cpu: CPU on which to write register.
>> + * @auto_act_window: Value to write to the autonomous activity window
>> register.
>> + */
>> +int cppc_set_auto_act_window(int cpu, u64 auto_act_window)
>> +{
>> + return cppc_set_reg_val(cpu, AUTO_ACT_WINDOW, auto_act_window);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_auto_act_window);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * cppc_get_auto_sel() - Read autonomous selection register.
>> + * @cpu: CPU from which to read register.
>> + * @auto_sel: Return address.
>> + */
>> +int cppc_get_auto_sel(int cpu, u64 *auto_sel)
>
> Similarly, maybe it would be better to use:
> int cppc_get_auto_sel(int cpu, bool *auto_sel);
>
>> +{
>> + return cppc_get_reg_val(cpu, AUTO_SEL_ENABLE, auto_sel);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_get_auto_sel);
>> +
>> /**
>> * cppc_get_auto_sel_caps - Read autonomous selection register.
>> * @cpunum : CPU from which to read register.
>> diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
>> index 62d368bcd9ec..134931b081a0 100644
>> --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
>> +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
>> @@ -159,6 +159,10 @@ extern int cpc_read_ffh(int cpunum, struct
>> cpc_reg *reg, u64 *val);
>> extern int cpc_write_ffh(int cpunum, struct cpc_reg *reg, u64 val);
>> extern int cppc_get_epp_perf(int cpunum, u64 *epp_perf);
>> extern int cppc_set_epp_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls
>> *perf_ctrls, bool enable);
>> +extern int cppc_set_epp(int cpu, u64 epp_val);
>> +extern int cppc_get_auto_act_window(int cpu, u64 *auto_act_window);
>> +extern int cppc_set_auto_act_window(int cpu, u64 auto_act_window);
>> +extern int cppc_get_auto_sel(int cpu, u64 *auto_sel);
>> extern int cppc_get_auto_sel_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps
>> *perf_caps);
>
> This is a bit annoying, but maybe only one function between:
> - cppc_get_auto_sel_caps()
> - cppc_get_auto_sel()
> is necessary.
>
> I added the owners of the amd-pstate driver to ask if this would
> be ok to replace cppc_get_auto_sel_caps() by cppc_get_auto_sel().
Yeah I have no concerns with this if that's the direction this patch
series goes. Feel free to change amd-pstate in the patch that
introduces cppc_get_auto_sel().
I'll be out around the US holiday, so I might not be able to review it
for a while, but CC Gautham on the series and he may be able to.
>
>> extern int cppc_set_auto_sel(int cpu, bool enable);
>> extern int amd_get_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu, u32 *highest_perf);
>> @@ -225,6 +229,22 @@ static inline int cppc_set_epp_perf(int cpu,
>> struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls,
>> {
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>> +static inline int cppc_set_epp(int cpu, u64 epp_val)
>> +{
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +}
>> +static inline int cppc_get_auto_act_window(int cpu, u64
>> *auto_act_window)
>> +{
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +}
>> +static inline int cppc_set_auto_act_window(int cpu, u64 auto_act_window)
>> +{
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +}
>> +static inline int cppc_get_auto_sel(int cpu, u64 *auto_sel)
>> +{
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +}
>> static inline int cppc_get_epp_perf(int cpunum, u64 *epp_perf)
>> {
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-17 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-16 9:15 [PATCH v3 0/4] Support for autonomous selection in cppc_cpufreq Lifeng Zheng
2024-12-16 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_reg_val and cppc_set_reg_val function Lifeng Zheng
2024-12-17 13:48 ` Pierre Gondois
2024-12-20 8:30 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-07 16:54 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-01-10 2:23 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-10 10:16 ` Pierre Gondois
2024-12-16 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ACPI: CPPC: Refactor register value get and set ABIs Lifeng Zheng
2024-12-16 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ACPI: CPPC: Add autonomous selection ABIs Lifeng Zheng
2024-12-17 13:48 ` Pierre Gondois
2024-12-17 20:38 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2024-12-20 8:56 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2024-12-20 8:38 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2024-12-16 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Support for autonomous selection in cppc_cpufreq Lifeng Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6650141-85cb-450d-ab62-0c2bea8ff1da@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=fanghao11@huawei.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hepeng68@huawei.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox