From: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ata: ahci: Do not check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:16:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecb5a2dd-47b2-e5e1-5254-42bd5d018578@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5607133.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher>
On 8/25/2022 13:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> The ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag merely means that it is better to
> use low-power S0 idle on the given platform than S3 (provided that
> the latter is supported) and it doesn't preclude using either of
> them (which of them will be used depends on the choices made by user
> space).
>
> For this reason, there is no benefit from checking that flag in
> ahci_update_initial_lpm_policy().
>
> First off, it cannot be a bug to do S3 with policy set to either
> ATA_LPM_MIN_POWER_WITH_PARTIAL or ATA_LPM_MIN_POWER, because S3 can be
> used on systems with ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 set and it must work if
> really supported, so the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 check is not needed to
> protect the S3-capable systems from failing.
>
> Second, suspend-to-idle can be carried out on a system with
> ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 unset and it is expected to work, so if setting
> policy to either ATA_LPM_MIN_POWER_WITH_PARTIAL or ATA_LPM_MIN_POWER is
> needed to handle that case correctly, it should be done regardless of
> the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 value.
>
> Accordingly, drop the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 check from
> ahci_update_initial_lpm_policy() along with the CONFIG_ACPI #ifdef
> around it that is not necessary any more.
Looking at the source commit for this behavior:
b1a9585cc396 ("ata: ahci: Enable DEVSLP by default on x86 with SLP_S0")
It was trying to set a policy tied to when the system is defaulting to
suspend to idle.
To try to match the spirit of the original request but not tying it to
the FADT, how about using pm_suspend_default_s2idle()?
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * Adjust subject (Damien).
> * Drop #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI that is not necessary any more (Mario).
> * Update the changelog.
>
> ---
> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> @@ -1609,15 +1609,12 @@ static void ahci_update_initial_lpm_poli
> goto update_policy;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> - if (policy > ATA_LPM_MED_POWER &&
> - (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0)) {
> + if (policy > ATA_LPM_MED_POWER) {
> if (hpriv->cap & HOST_CAP_PART)
> policy = ATA_LPM_MIN_POWER_WITH_PARTIAL;
> else if (hpriv->cap & HOST_CAP_SSC)
> policy = ATA_LPM_MIN_POWER;
> }
> -#endif
>
> update_policy:
> if (policy >= ATA_LPM_UNKNOWN && policy <= ATA_LPM_MIN_POWER)
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-25 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-25 18:01 [PATCH v2] ata: ahci: Do not check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-25 18:16 ` Limonciello, Mario [this message]
2022-08-25 18:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-25 18:29 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-08-25 18:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ecb5a2dd-47b2-e5e1-5254-42bd5d018578@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox