From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER
MANAGEM..." <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
jank@cadence.com, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
"open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)"
<devel@acpica.org>, Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ACPI / device_sysfs: change _ADR representation to 64 bits
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:23:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eda0ed4e-fc36-a53a-225f-e7d54bb73413@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jOkQ7aWn6B_yVTYd7y+78mpGSzBoGuWe3uCdzDRNE94Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/16/19 3:09 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 5:29 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 15-04-19, 10:18, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>> Standards such as the MIPI DisCo for SoundWire 1.0 specification
>>> assume the _ADR field is 64 bits.
>>>
>>> _ADR is defined as an "Integer" represented as 64 bits since ACPI 2.0
>>> released in 2002. The low levels already use _ADR as 64 bits, e.g. in
>>> struct acpi_device_info.
>>>
>>> This patch bumps the representation used for sysfs to 64 bits.
>>>
>>> Example with a SoundWire device, the results show the complete
>>> vendorID and linkID which were omitted before:
>>>
>>> Before:
>>> $ more /sys/bus/acpi/devices/device\:38/adr
>>> 0x5d070000
>>> After:
>>> $ more /sys/bus/acpi/devices/device\:38/adr
>>> 0x000010025d070000
>>
>> This looks fine but the sysfs file is an ABI. Not sure if we can modify
>> the value returned this way.. Though it should not cause userspace
>> reading 32bits to break...
>
> Well, IIRC using "08" instead of "016" in the format field would
> preserve the existing behavior for 32-bit values, wouldn't it?
yes, but it makes the 64-bit address not aligned depending on the number
of leading zeroes, see below. I get a migraine just looking at the results.
Maybe add a test to use 08 for values that are below 0xFFFFFFFF and 16
for addresses who really need the full range, typically because of an
encoding?
w/ value-dependent format:
/sys/bus/acpi/devices# cat */*/adr
0x00160000
0x00140003
0x000d0000
0x000d0002
0x000d0003
0x00070000
0x00070001
0x00070002
0x00070003
0x000010025d070100
0x000110025d070100
0x000210025d070100
0x000310025d070100
0x000010025d070000
0x000110025d070000
0x000210025d070000
0x000310025d070000
0x00000000
w/ 0x08 only:
0x00160000
0x00140003
0x000d0000
0x000d0002
0x000d0003
0x00070000
0x00070001
0x00070002
0x00070003
0x10025d070100
0x110025d070100
0x210025d070100
0x310025d070100
0x10025d070000
0x110025d070000
0x210025d070000
0x310025d070000
0x00000000
0x00000000
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-15 15:18 [PATCH] ACPI / device_sysfs: change _ADR representation to 64 bits Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-04-15 15:18 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-04-16 3:29 ` Vinod Koul
2019-04-16 3:29 ` Vinod Koul
2019-04-16 8:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-16 8:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-04-16 9:09 ` Vinod Koul
2019-04-16 9:09 ` Vinod Koul
2019-04-30 18:23 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2019-04-30 18:23 ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-05-01 7:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-01 7:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eda0ed4e-fc36-a53a-225f-e7d54bb73413@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=erik.schmauss@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jank@cadence.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox