From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: VIOT: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 12:03:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2685007-0331-aaea-bfbe-074a3680fc29@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220802193503.3092-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Hi Andy,
On 8/2/22 21:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> In order to make the underneath API easier to change in the future,
> prevent users from dereferencing fwnode from struct device.
> Instead, use the specific dev_fwnode() and device_match_fwnode()
> APIs for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Thanks
Eric
> ---
> drivers/acpi/viot.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/viot.c b/drivers/acpi/viot.c
> index 647f11cf165d..6132092dab2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/viot.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/viot.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int __init viot_get_pci_iommu_fwnode(struct viot_iommu *viommu,
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - fwnode = pdev->dev.fwnode;
> + fwnode = dev_fwnode(&pdev->dev);
> if (!fwnode) {
> /*
> * PCI devices aren't necessarily described by ACPI. Create a
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int __init viot_get_pci_iommu_fwnode(struct viot_iommu *viommu,
> }
> set_primary_fwnode(&pdev->dev, fwnode);
> }
> - viommu->fwnode = pdev->dev.fwnode;
> + viommu->fwnode = dev_fwnode(&pdev->dev);
> pci_dev_put(pdev);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static int viot_dev_iommu_init(struct device *dev, struct viot_iommu *viommu,
> return -ENODEV;
>
> /* We're not translating ourself */
> - if (viommu->fwnode == dev->fwnode)
> + if (device_match_fwnode(dev, viommu->fwnode))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> ops = iommu_ops_from_fwnode(viommu->fwnode);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-03 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-02 19:35 [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: VIOT: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device Andy Shevchenko
2022-08-03 10:03 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2022-08-08 17:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2685007-0331-aaea-bfbe-074a3680fc29@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox