From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] ACPI / scan: Initialize status to ACPI_STA_DEFAULT
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:58:05 +0200
Message-ID: <f2f9289d-0adb-e165-a23e-696fe985fda4@redhat.com>
References: <20180809091558.4317-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
 <20180809091558.4317-2-hdegoede@redhat.com>
 <CAJZ5v0jBxL8n8ce7=qgZmHtc4=zCA3u7ePbXaHfyibeNiNrw+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <7d8c71b9-292e-e51e-d3d3-cb0bb00528b6@redhat.com>
 <CAHp75VeiC35S=urEL_f-j+ZPVodPHqGJBRYxv2m5inBkuJ=1kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VeiC35S=urEL_f-j+ZPVodPHqGJBRYxv2m5inBkuJ=1kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>, linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On 09-08-18 11:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 09-08-18 11:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
> 
>>> I've applied the v4 of this patch and I don't think there are any
>>> changes from it here.
>>
>>
>> Correct, there were only changes to the 4th patch in the series.
>>
>>> As for the rest of the series I'll wait from comments from Wolfram and
>>> the other reviewers.
>>
>>
>> Ok, note if you've taken patch 1 you may also want to take patch 3 which
>> is an ACPI code cleanup made possible by patch 1 and otherwise is
>> unrelated.
> 
> I'm under impression Rafael is going to take entire series (at least
> for patch 4 I'm expecting to give an Ack).

As I mentioned in the coverletter, my idea was to have Rafael take
patches 1-3 and then merge the 4th patch through the platform/x86
tree. There are only runtime dependencies between the 2 parts and
merging them independently should not cause any issues.

Regards,

Hans