From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@gmail.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>,
Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@amd.com>,
Nikhil Agarwal <nikhil.agarwal@amd.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] iommu: Resolve ops in iommu_init_device()
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:46:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa4b6cfc67a352488b7f4e0b736008307ce9ac2e.1740753261.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1740753261.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Since iommu_init_device() was factored out, it is in fact the only
consumer of the ops which __iommu_probe_device() is resolving, so let it
do that itself rather than passing them in. This also puts the ops
lookup at a more logical point relative to the rest of the flow through
__iommu_probe_device().
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
---
v2: New
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 179617bb412d..37b7088e129a 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -404,14 +404,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_iommu_priv_set);
* Init the dev->iommu and dev->iommu_group in the struct device and get the
* driver probed
*/
-static int iommu_init_device(struct device *dev, const struct iommu_ops *ops)
+static int iommu_init_device(struct device *dev)
{
+ const struct iommu_ops *ops;
struct iommu_device *iommu_dev;
struct iommu_group *group;
int ret;
if (!dev_iommu_get(dev))
return -ENOMEM;
+ /*
+ * For FDT-based systems and ACPI IORT/VIOT, drivers register IOMMU
+ * instances with non-NULL fwnodes, and client devices should have been
+ * identified with a fwspec by this point. Otherwise, we can currently
+ * assume that only one of Intel, AMD, s390, PAMU or legacy SMMUv2 can
+ * be present, and that any of their registered instances has suitable
+ * ops for probing, and thus cheekily co-opt the same mechanism.
+ */
+ ops = iommu_fwspec_ops(dev->iommu->fwspec);
+ if (!ops) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_free;
+ }
if (!try_module_get(ops->owner)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -514,22 +528,10 @@ DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_probe_device_lock);
static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list)
{
- const struct iommu_ops *ops;
struct iommu_group *group;
struct group_device *gdev;
int ret;
- /*
- * For FDT-based systems and ACPI IORT/VIOT, drivers register IOMMU
- * instances with non-NULL fwnodes, and client devices should have been
- * identified with a fwspec by this point. Otherwise, we can currently
- * assume that only one of Intel, AMD, s390, PAMU or legacy SMMUv2 can
- * be present, and that any of their registered instances has suitable
- * ops for probing, and thus cheekily co-opt the same mechanism.
- */
- ops = iommu_fwspec_ops(dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev));
- if (!ops)
- return -ENODEV;
/*
* Serialise to avoid races between IOMMU drivers registering in
* parallel and/or the "replay" calls from ACPI/OF code via client
@@ -543,7 +545,7 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
if (dev->iommu_group)
return 0;
- ret = iommu_init_device(dev, ops);
+ ret = iommu_init_device(dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-28 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 15:46 [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu: Fix the longstanding probe issues Robin Murphy
2025-02-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] iommu: Handle race with default domain setup Robin Murphy
2025-02-28 15:46 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2025-03-05 17:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] iommu: Resolve ops in iommu_init_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu: Keep dev->iommu state consistent Robin Murphy
2025-03-05 18:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu: Get DT/ACPI parsing into the proper probe path Robin Murphy
2025-03-05 18:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-03-07 14:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-03-07 20:20 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-11 18:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2025-03-12 7:07 ` Baolu Lu
2025-03-12 10:10 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-12 14:34 ` Baolu Lu
2025-03-12 15:21 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <CGME20250313095633eucas1p29cb55f2504b4bcf67c16b3bd3fa9b8cd@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-03-13 9:56 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-13 11:01 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-13 12:23 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-13 13:06 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-13 14:12 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-17 7:37 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-17 18:22 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-21 12:15 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-21 16:48 ` Robin Murphy
2025-04-01 20:34 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-13 16:30 ` Anders Roxell
2025-03-18 16:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-03-18 17:24 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-25 15:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-03-27 9:47 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-03-27 11:00 ` Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2025-04-11 8:02 ` Johan Hovold
2025-04-14 15:37 ` Robin Murphy
2025-04-15 15:08 ` Johan Hovold
2025-04-24 13:58 ` Robin Murphy
2025-04-21 21:19 ` William McVicker
2025-04-22 19:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-04-22 21:55 ` William McVicker
2025-04-22 23:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-04-23 17:31 ` William McVicker
2025-04-23 18:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-11 16:44 ` Eric Auger
2025-08-11 17:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-10 8:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu: Fix the longstanding probe issues Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa4b6cfc67a352488b7f4e0b736008307ce9ac2e.1740753261.git.robin.murphy@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=nikhil.agarwal@amd.com \
--cc=nipun.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=quic_charante@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=stuyoder@gmail.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).