From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] device property: Track owner device of device property
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 16:41:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcde8be2-e19b-901c-b8fe-8dc54d1e847d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171020143423.GA27882@kroah.com>
On 10/20/2017 05:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> @@ -938,6 +940,7 @@ int device_add_properties(struct device *dev,
>>
>> p->fwnode.ops = &pset_fwnode_ops;
>> set_secondary_fwnode(dev, &p->fwnode);
>> + p->dev = dev;
>
> Don't you also need to increment the reference counter here? Or how is
> it assured that it will not go away?
>
I need to scratch my head on this. It sounds more robust to track
references and remove properties when last reference is dropped in
device_remove_properties(). What I don't know are properties be expected
to be copied and be usable for another device for instance by
ACPI_COMPANION_SET().
I can figure out case where properties are added to one device, another
device gets reference to them via ACPI_COMPANION_SET() and properties
get freed when the first device is removed. But should the second device
be able to use those properties at first place?
Rafael: What's you opinion: should there be reference counting for
device properties? Initial increment in device_add_properties(), other
around ACPI_COMPANION_SET()/set_primary_fwnode() and decrementing in
device_remove_properties().
--
Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-24 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-09 13:28 [PATCH] device property: Track owner device of device property Jarkko Nikula
2017-10-20 14:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-10-24 13:41 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fcde8be2-e19b-901c-b8fe-8dc54d1e847d@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).