Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared

[ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)]

Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> writes:

> On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 07:49:56 +0100
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:44:29PM +0100, Olivier Nicolas wrote:
>> 
>> > Hi,
>> 
>> Hi Olivier,
>> 
>> > 2.6.19-rc5 does not boot properly, I have tried pci=routeirq, irpoll 
>> > without success.
>> > 
>> > Full details (.config, dmesg, /proc/interrupts) are in 
>> > http://olivn.trollprod.org/2.6.19-rc5-irq.tar.gz
>> 
>> thanks for your report!
>> 
>> I might be wrong, but looking at the dmesg:
>> - irq 22 is the hda_intel IRQ
>> - the "irq 22: nobody cared" is immediately before the
>>   "hda_intel: No response from codec, disabling MSI..."
>> - in the routeirq case, the hda_intel IRQ as well as the
>>   IRQ in the error message change to 21
>> 
>> So it might be related to the hda_intel MSI check.
>
> More likely the MSI management routines don't work for disabling MSI.

Well brand new MSI handling could be buggy, the disable hypothesis doesn't
make much sense on boot up.

> I am debugging a problem where MSI doesn't work across suspend/resume,
> I suspect the base MSI code needs fixing.

Rethinking the interfaces maybe I don't think the code is broken I think
most likely it is just not designed to do the right thing.  I remember
thinking how horrible that code is, when I read through it.

Eric