From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc5 x86_64 irq 22: nobody cared Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:11:28 -0700 Message-ID: References: <5986589C150B2F49A46483AC44C7BCA49071D9@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:31666 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1424423AbWKJUMq (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:12:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5986589C150B2F49A46483AC44C7BCA49071D9@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> (Yinghai Lu's message of "Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:20:58 -0800") Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Lu, Yinghai" Cc: Andi Kleen , Olivier Nicolas , Andrew Morton , Adrian Bunk , Stephen Hemminger , Takashi Iwai , Jaroslav Kysela , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, len.brown@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds "Lu, Yinghai" writes: > Andi, > > The two patches solve the problems that irq nobody care. > > They are already in your tree. But first one I wonder if you put correct > one in your tree. YH. This is a completely different problem. The irq is properly setup and received but none of the drivers wanted it. Eric