From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Vromans Subject: Re: SMBus access Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 10:41:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20060701141015.a4922e86.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.26]:25098 "EHLO smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750863AbWGBIl6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 04:41:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060701141015.a4922e86.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (Randy Dunlap's message of "Sat, 1 Jul 2006 14:10:15 -0700") Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: Johan Vromans , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org "Randy.Dunlap" writes: > a. patch should also be sent to linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org (cc-ed) > b. patch does not apply cleanly to latest kernel > c. missing Signed-off-by: line (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches) > d. incorrect patch filename directory level (see SubmittingPatches) All procedural issues, than can easily be solved. So I take it there are no technical/philosophical/emotional/ethical objections against this change? -- Johan