From: Jan Rychter <jan-JAsPCFd0eodBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: /proc naming inconsistency
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:26:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2el0i6vwk.fsf@tnuctip.rychter.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 422 bytes --]
While writing some userspace utilities it has struck me that we have a
general structure of
/proc/acpi/device_class/*/data
for processor, thermal, embedded_controller, ac adapter, power_resource
and battery... but not for buttons. Buttons show up as:
/proc/acpi/device_class/subclass/*/data
Is there a reason for this? Will this be unified? What should one expect
the interface to be?
thanks,
--J.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2003-07-22 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2el0i6vwk.fsf@tnuctip.rychter.com \
--to=jan-jaspcfd0eodbdgjk7y7tuq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox