From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Georg C. F. Greve" Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: status update for current development on ASUS M2N Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:28:34 +0200 Sender: softwaresuspend-devel-admin@berlios.de Message-ID: References: <20040927123320.GA28634@hell.org.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="20040927152834+0200-7410138712642398310629575"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040927123320.GA28634@hell.org.pl> (Karol Kozimor's message of "Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:33:20 +0200") Errors-To: softwaresuspend-devel-admin@berlios.de List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: SoftwareSuspend-devel@lists.berlios.de List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org --20040927152834+0200-7410138712642398310629575 || On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:33:20 +0200 || Karol Kozimor wrote: kk> I had that issue too, with 2.6.9-rc1 I s'pose, but I thought it kk> was just bug #3193 revisited and didn't really investigate. Does kk> changing swsusp2 to _not_ use ACPI S4 help? It seems that this is not a compile-time option anymore and solely determined by /proc/software_suspend/acpi_s4_support, right? Output of 'cat /proc/software_suspend/acpi_s4_support' is '0'. So unless something is activating it somewhere, somehow, it seems that this _is_ with deactivated ACPI S4. Regards, Georg -- Georg C. F. Greve Free Software Foundation Europe (http://fsfeurope.org) Brave GNU World (http://brave-gnu-world.org) --20040927152834+0200-7410138712642398310629575 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBWBWCbvivwoZXSsoRAg/MAJkBcL9+vrem7y0jZ5d3nTEG0u1qsgCgiDYM SPMEKJ3TVqEEf81c8XaAL1w= =4ZTo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --20040927152834+0200-7410138712642398310629575--