From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Cloos Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: Add sampling window to enhance ondemand governor power efficiency Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 23:24:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1293085424-18212-1-git-send-email-youquan.song@intel.com> <20101223110020.GC18363@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> <20101223173402.GA3821@redhat.com> <20101223205148.GB6441@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eagle.jhcloos.com ([207.210.242.212]:47197 "EHLO eagle.jhcloos.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753248Ab0LYEy4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Dec 2010 23:54:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20101223205148.GB6441@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> (Dominik Brodowski's message of "Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:51:48 +0100") Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Dominik Brodowski Cc: Dave Jones , Youquan Song , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, venki@google.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, kent.liu@intel.com, chaohong.guo@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Youquan Song >>>>> "DB" == Dominik Brodowski writes: DB> AFAICS, we have two in-kernel dynamic frequency scaling governors, one of DB> which doesn't seem to get much usage (conservative)... Isn't conservative the recommended choice for AMD processors? Or has that changed? -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6