From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: djh Subject: Re: what's difference between rpm -Fvh and -ivh Date: 06 Aug 2002 14:24:33 +0200 Sender: linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1028636682.1831.1.camel@vaio-djh> References: <1E8992B3CD28D4119D5B00508B08EC5601F7BCC2@sinxsn02.ap.rabobank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1E8992B3CD28D4119D5B00508B08EC5601F7BCC2@sinxsn02.ap.rabobank.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" Cc: 'admin' from "man rpm": rpm {-F|--freshen} [install-options] PACKAGE_FILE ... This will upgrade packages, but only if an earlier version currently exists. bye helmut On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 09:47, Sim, CT (Chee Tong) wrote: > > Hi.. May I know what is the difference btw rpm -ivh and rpm -Fvh ??? > > [root@durian simc]# rpm -Fvh openssl-perl-0.9.6b-24.i386.rpm > {root@durian simc}# > [root@durian simc]# rpm -ivh openssl-perl-0.9.6b-24.i386.rpm > error: failed dependencies: > openssl = 0.9.6b-24 is needed by openssl-perl-0.9.6b-24 > [root@durian simc]# > > ================================================================== > De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en > is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht > onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en > de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. > ================================================================== > The information contained in this message may be confidential > and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you > receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents > herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. > > > ================================================================== > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-admin" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html