From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Suelwald Subject: Re: Spammers Date: 09 Aug 2003 20:51:41 +0200 Sender: linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1060455100.16417.14.camel@science> References: <6734256000.20030809185259@xhost.cz> <20030809175520.GL6898@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-f6S0nll4T8QMBXNBByGH" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20030809175520.GL6898@mea-ext.zmailer.org> List-Id: To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org --=-f6S0nll4T8QMBXNBByGH Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sam, 2003-08-09 um 19.55 schrieb Matti Aarnio: > Running lists _closed_ doesn't solve the thing either. It would > be enough for a spammer to fake source address that is known poster > to a list. We have to use message content analysis, but that isn't > very effective, when the content is extremely short (one web URL, > or some such..) Main reason to not to close the lists is that > it would be a royal pain for managers, and for users... It would reduce the amoung of spam... Running spamassassin wouild help to get rid of most the spammails, i think --=-f6S0nll4T8QMBXNBByGH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/NUK8ZVmSH3An2a4RAs4cAJ9KQRPfFMpZN6Ocy3rn3HU/F0Gk+gCdEkt2 6kYKuTip6ovjfZ9+njOooD8= =X3GL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-f6S0nll4T8QMBXNBByGH--