From: Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
To: query <query.cdac@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Preventing SSH timeouts . Some clarification needed
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 17:19:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19470.28038.973172.643232@cerise.gclements.plus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimFBZmoPZLIgi_Z9yzzm3gPWMU0ktW6Wh9XgQFf@mail.gmail.com>
query wrote:
> > I can't see how this can be caused by load. If you haven't yet enabled
> > ClientAliveInterval, then the connection isn't being closed by sshd
> > but by the kernel, due to TCP keep-alives not being acknowledged.
>
> okay...that may be the cause . The client host was also busy because
> of which TCP keep-alive were not acknowledged.
Load won't have any effect upon TCP keep-alives, as it's the kernel
which acknowledges keep-alive packets, not the user process.
Keep-alive allows you to detect that a host is unreachable (e.g.
network failure, system crash, power failure, etc). It doesn't tell
you anything about an individual process.
> > As Michal suggests, the most likely reason for this is a NAT timeout.
> > If you're using NAT, you probably want to set the keep-alive time
> > (/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_time) to a value less than the NAT
> > timeout. Even then, that will only work for programs which enable
> > keep-alive (ssh and sshd both do by default; this is controlled by the
> > TCPKeepAlive option).
>
> How to determine the value of NAT timeout . Is it at the host level or
> the device where NATing is implemented .
The device which performs NAT.
> I was able to find the keepalive timeout value at the host .
>
> ====
> $ sudo sysctl -a | grep -i keepalive
> net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time = 7200
> net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_probes = 9
> net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_intvl = 75
> =====
>
> Most likely I am not behind NAT , I will confirm it tomorrow . If that
> is the case , then which should I consider to increase the timeout
> value.
> The kernel timeout value or implement either TCPKeepAlive option or
> the ClientAliveInterval interval . TCPKeepAlive option is somehow
> disabled in the sshd config file . Please clarify regarding this.
TCPKeepAlive is enabled by default. But even if it's enabled, the
2-hour wait before any keep-alives are sent typically won't be enough
to prevent NAT entries from expiring.
Even the 5-minute interval between SSH keep-alives may be longer than
the NAT expiry time. Low-end router/modem devices with built-in NAT
seem base their default configuration on the assumption that you're
using HTTP from Win95 boxes, where a connection being idle for more
than 30 seconds usually means that the Win95 box has crashed.
Another possibility is a really cheap ISP which uses (a heavily
oversubscribed pool of) dynamic IP addresses, which expire whenever
the connection is idle for more than a minute.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-08 9:36 Preventing SSH timeouts . Some clarification needed query
2010-06-08 9:48 ` Michal Nazarewicz
[not found] ` <AANLkTimTjSOmbj_ac4iiUMaHRuvp1-ljW-FUGAQbb1qt@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <87k4q9g31y.fsf@erwin.mina86.com>
2010-06-08 15:10 ` query
2010-06-08 19:48 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2010-06-09 5:33 ` query
2010-06-08 10:39 ` Glynn Clements
2010-06-08 15:10 ` query
2010-06-08 16:19 ` Glynn Clements [this message]
2010-06-09 6:44 ` query
2010-06-09 8:15 ` Adam T. Bowen
2010-06-09 10:14 ` Glynn Clements
[not found] ` <AANLkTimDS_IalexVnOKtOuKN8fz13rFumHV8TrjEGtph@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <19471.47290.566464.539451@cerise.gclements.plus.com>
2010-06-10 6:02 ` query
2010-06-10 13:03 ` Glynn Clements
2010-06-10 16:35 ` query
2010-06-10 23:52 ` Glynn Clements
2010-06-11 7:22 ` query
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19470.28038.973172.643232@cerise.gclements.plus.com \
--to=glynn@gclements.plus.com \
--cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=query.cdac@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).