From: James <james@piku.org.uk>
To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what tech?
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 08:59:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020428075914.GA5292@piku.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020428013622.00a739e0@mail.tumsan.fi>
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 01:46:47AM +0300, urgrue wrote:
| is there something like dsl, but cheaper, that would be appropriate for
| getting a connection along normal copper wires at relatively short
| distances (a few hundred meters at most?
| just plain old ethernet is almost sufficient, but the distances im talking
| about would require slightly more, and it would be better if it didnt need
| two pairs of wire. speed is not important, even half a meg is okay.
| dsl is too expensive for this purpose, and overkill anyway.
|
| basically the point is to run connections through an apartment building.
| what would be appropriate?
Well if it's through a building and not across open fields, etc then
ethernet is probably the cheapest. When you reach the 100-and-whatever
metre limit of cat5, just stick a cheap 2 port hub on the end, and
continue the wire for another 100m. And if speed's not important, a
10Mbit network will run further than a 100Mbit one with fewer errors.
This is probably how large offices cable themselves up.
And if you can push one wire through the wall, whatever, you can easily
push two (besides, a piece of cat5 isn't that thick, no thicker than
regular phone wire you'd be using for dsl, and it's fairly cheap too).
--
I will not encourage others to fly
6AD6 865A BF6E 76BB 1FC2 | www.piku.org.uk/public-key.asc
E4C4 DEEA 7D08 D511 E149 | www.piku.org.uk wnzrf@cvxh.bet.hx (rot13'd)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-28 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-27 22:46 what tech? urgrue
2002-04-28 7:59 ` James [this message]
2002-04-29 13:09 ` terry white
2002-04-29 17:03 ` James
2002-04-29 20:02 ` Kyle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020428075914.GA5292@piku.org.uk \
--to=james@piku.org.uk \
--cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).