linux-admin.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonid Mamchenkov <f.l.linux-admin@news.francoudi.com>
To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Red Hat Network ...
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:19:54 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030305091954.GB3555@francoudi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20030304063004.00b02ae8@mustang>

Dear Scott Taylor,

Once you wrote about "RE: Red Hat Network ...":
ST> >>     and yet another reason NOT to depend on RH ...
ST> 
ST> Well put Terry, depend only on yourself.  

Agreed. :)

ST> Still, there is nothing wrong with RH, other than they are looking 
ST> more and more like M$ every day.  Oh well, someone has to make money
ST> off this thing, and RH has put a lot into it, they deserve to get 
ST> some back, as do others that back and support Linux.

While I can understand the feeling some people have about RedHat these
days, I certainly disagree.  RedHat is a profit-oriented company and is
very well expected to charge for something.  RedHat's product is
service.  RedHat Network is one of them.  You want a service, you pay
the money.  As simple as that.  If you just need the updates, then you
can easily get them from ftp://updates.redhat.com using either wget or
any of the numerious scripts from http://freshmeat.net .  Updates are
_FREE_, and you have the _SOURCE_ for all of them.  That's something M$
has a lot of troubles with. ;)

ST> So, now for all the time RHN saves me in searching for downloads to keep my 
ST> one out ten servers up-to-date, I'm not going to whine about filling out a 
ST> simple little survey.  I might fudge anything personal and give them my 
ST> freemail.com address that I never check, but what can it hurt to give them 
ST> 2-3 minutes, even 10 minutes, of your time every 60 days.  Compared to the 
ST> time I'm saving right now, as I respond to this silliness and RH updates my 
ST> server for me, and the time it took to grab that next coffee and fill out 
ST> some survey, it is nothing.

Actually, all comes down to money anyway.  RedHat offers a "Basic
subscription" which is only 60$ per year (
https://rhn.redhat.com/info/purchase_info.pxt ).  Now, count 10 minutes
every 60 days in the year, you get roughly 1 hour.  If you make less
then 60$ an hour, you are better of with the survey, otherwise just buy
the damn thing. :)

ST> <snippet from previous link>
ST> The carrots? There are implied sticks to most of these. Paid
ST> subscribers will get instant access to ISOs as soon as they're out,
ST> which means "no more long downloads from ftp sites, driving to the
ST> store, or waiting for your friends to finish with their copy."
ST> </snippet>
ST> That doesn't sound so bad to me.  If I was running 20 RH servers, this 
ST> would be a blessing.  Back in the days of SCO Open Server I was paying a 
ST> large amount of money for their yearly support and updates products, not to 
ST> mention their per-user license.  Now I do more work, serve more users on 

-- 
Best regards,
  Leonid Mamtchenkov, RHCE
  System Administrator
  Francoudi & Stephanou Ltd.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-05  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <C65F89D1AC0BB54B865127151A24DA780E49087F@nbexchm2.aliant.i cn>
2003-03-04 15:21 ` Red Hat Network Scott Taylor
2003-03-05  9:19   ` Leonid Mamchenkov [this message]
     [not found] <C65F89D1AC0BB54B865127151A24DA780E49089C@nbexchm2.aliant.i cn>
2003-03-04 16:12 ` Scott Taylor
     [not found] <C65F89D1AC0BB54B865127151A24DA780E490896@nbexchm2.aliant.i cn>
2003-03-04 15:46 ` Scott Taylor
2003-03-04 15:41 Shaw, Marco
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-04 12:11 Shaw, Marco
2003-03-04 13:04 ` terry white
2003-03-04 11:19 terry white

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030305091954.GB3555@francoudi.com \
    --to=f.l.linux-admin@news.francoudi.com \
    --cc=leonid@francoudi.com \
    --cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).