From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-admin-ml@schottelius.org>
Subject: Re: Cryptoloop and kernel 2.6?
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:47:01 +0100
Sender: linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20040112224701.GB8154@schottelius.org>
References: <200401112002.20084.krylon@gmx.net> <40030B4F.5000005@kssb.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ"
Return-path: <linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40030B4F.5000005@kssb.net>
List-Id: <linux-admin.vger.kernel.org>
To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Cc: scholz@wdt.de


--i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bradley Hook [Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:02:07PM -0600]:
> Just for kicks I went and did a cryptoloop-device on my slack9.1 box.=20
> Fairly easy, no patches required, and you can *almost* follow the=20
> directions at:
>=20
> http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Loopback-Encrypted-Filesystem-HOWTO.html
>=20
> A quick run-down of what to do:
> [...]

what about crypto loops created within 2.4?
Is it possible something changed and 2.6 cannot read the old
ones?

Greetings,

Nico

--=20
Keep it simple & stupid, use what's available.
pgp: 8D0E E27A          | Nico Schottelius
http://nerd-hosting.net | http://linux.schottelius.org

--i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAAyPlzGnTqo0OJ6QRAniMAJ44vKa+B3BGkasjcXB94FIDvUrGWwCcCP7z
nkr22eyn8CMctb78xFC+Nd4=
=uhWC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ--