From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: markus reichelt Subject: Re: Cryptoloop and kernel 2.6? Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:27:49 +0100 Sender: linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040114122749.GA1787@mainserver.organic.net> References: <200401112002.20084.krylon@gmx.net> <40030B4F.5000005@kssb.net> <20040112224701.GB8154@schottelius.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040112224701.GB8154@schottelius.org> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; x-action="pgp-signed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org Cc: Nico Schottelius , scholz@wdt.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nico Schottelius wrote: > what about crypto loops created within 2.4? > Is it possible something changed and 2.6 cannot read the old > ones? sigh, so much is possible these days... do you experience any problems with your crypto loops created with a 2.4 kernel under a brand new 2.6? do you use crypto loops in the first place? if so, why don't you just find out and tell us? :) - -- Bastard Administrator in $hell GPG-Key at http://lists.notified.de/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFABTXFLMyTO8Kj/uQRAllfAJ9ri0sLJOoqafuNDaeNYs5zZwiPQgCeNghR Yl7Un7FSEwLX10EyyxMSQ14= =KW3O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----