From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nico Schottelius Subject: Re: Cryptoloop and kernel 2.6? Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:51:49 +0100 Sender: linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040114125149.GB15599@schottelius.org> References: <200401112002.20084.krylon@gmx.net> <40030B4F.5000005@kssb.net> <20040112224701.GB8154@schottelius.org> <20040114122749.GA1787@mainserver.organic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040114122749.GA1787@mainserver.organic.net> List-Id: To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org, scholz@wdt.de --zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable markus reichelt [Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:27:49PM +0100]: > Nico Schottelius wrote: > > what about crypto loops created within 2.4? > > Is it possible something changed and 2.6 cannot read the old > > ones? >=20 > sigh, so much is possible these days... that was true since we live, not just today. Goethe's "Faust" shows you that very well. > do you experience any problems with your crypto loops created with a > 2.4 kernel under a brand new 2.6? do you use crypto loops in the > first place? if so, why don't you just find out and tell us? :) "tell" no go on and fix it ;) Nico ps: does anyone know if there were changes in the cryptoloop, which cause this problem? --=20 Keep it simple & stupid, use what's available. pgp: 8D0E E27A | Nico Schottelius http://nerd-hosting.net | http://linux.schottelius.org --zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFABTtlzGnTqo0OJ6QRAm2oAKCA0yfLb2rqm2kyv+rt6PnENr3PUACcCkBt DgAoqDplbaA1iiu7ILVp/Ic= =pPCu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O--