From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcel Gschwandl <tautau@gmx.ch>
Subject: Re: how reliable is ping?
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:06:14 +0100
Message-ID: <200412061106.15069.tautau@gmx.ch>
References: <200412061019.19099.fluca1978@infinito.it> <e29bf9c504120601297860275b@mail.gmail.com> <60a7468904120601384fa86783@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1354462.iQLNKKHh6E";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <60a7468904120601384fa86783@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-admin.vger.kernel.org>
To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org

--nextPart1354462.iQLNKKHh6E
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

IMHO ping isn't even meant to be used for bandwidth testing as it only show=
s=20
roundtrip times which have nothing to do with bandwidth but with latency.
So if you want to test your bandwidth you will have to use the already=20
mentioned websites.

hth
Marcel

--nextPart1354462.iQLNKKHh6E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBtC8Xgeas7c8EPE8RAg4GAJ9sxOaclKB9hyp5Idawz1ENpUs2kACeMAxB
oHePCV0weEZaNUeqAE+Gup4=
=7+qr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1354462.iQLNKKHh6E--