From: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@katamail.com>
To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: samba or nfs?
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:14:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412161214.40240.fluca1978@katamail.com> (raw)
Hi,
in my factory we are sharing resources (files) among different linux servers,
even located in another site (i.e., using an adsl connection). Which do you
believe is the better sharing protocol (NFS/SAMBA) to mount server resources?
Actually we are using samba, due also to the fact that the line speed was not
very high and NFS seemed to have a few problem with the speed. Now that the
speed is higher, but the line has a few moment of freeze, samba seems to be
inadequate. Any opinion?
Thanks,
Luca
--
Luca Ferrari,
fluca1978@katamail.com
next reply other threads:[~2004-12-16 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-16 11:14 Luca Ferrari [this message]
2004-12-16 12:20 ` samba or nfs? Martin Klier
2004-12-17 8:42 ` urgrue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200412161214.40240.fluca1978@katamail.com \
--to=fluca1978@katamail.com \
--cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).