From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Ferrari Subject: Re: graphic chars, set-font and sed Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:46:07 +0200 Message-ID: <200504201846.07602.fluca1978@infinito.it> References: <200504121825.47345.fluca1978@infinito.it> <16990.54990.383320.531930@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Reply-To: fluca1978@infinito.it Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <16990.54990.383320.531930@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 14 April 2005 22:47 Glynn Clements's cat walking on the keyboard wrote: > > Second, I've noticed that sed regular expressions get > > confused by the presence of multiple semigraphic chars, while a single > > one seems to work ok. Does anybody knows a way to "escape" those chars, > > in order to make them understandable to sed and other programs? > > sed itself should be 8-bit clean; are you sure that this isn't an > encoding (e.g. ISO-8859-1 vs UTF-8) issue? I don't know what you mean with "encoding issue". How can I discover it? Luca -- Luca Ferrari, fluca1978@infinito.it