linux-admin.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Bueno <joseph.bueno@trader.com>
To: g.pavlin@gmx.at
Cc: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance problem
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:23:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CC41CE1.78F7CDF@trader.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: PDENLACDNCNBIDBJGOMAIEGNCAAA.g.pavlin@gmx.at

Gregor Pavlin a écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to configure a small, embedded Linux system (Pentium III
> 1000MHz), that supports Java+X-Windows. In any case, the Java application
> runs very slowly. Even worse, the same application runs on a Linux-system
> with a (Pentium III 450MHz)twice as fast.
> 
> Initially I thought that it was the X-server configuration problem but now I
> guess that it has to do with scheduling. Namely, when I checked the
> processes with "top" on both systems and got interesting results:
> 
> System with (Pentium III 1000MHz):
> 
> Java stuff was assigned less than 30% of the CPU
> X windows used more than 60% of the CPU resources.
> 
> System with (Pentium III 450MHz):
> 
> Java more than 80% of the CPU
> X windows few % of the CPU resources.
> 
> In order to influence the CPU sharing on the slow computer (Pentium III
> 1000MHz) I tryed "nice --20 /$PATH/java-application". However, this doesn't
> result in a significant improvement in performance.
> 
> Therefore I have the following questions:
> 
> 1.) Can this be a scheduler's problem?
> 
> 2.) If so, are there any other ways I can influence the scheduler, e.g. the
> policy without recompiling the Kernel?
> 
> 3.) I'm using a read-only mounted file systems with about 10 MB RAM-disk and
> no Swapping. Could these features be a problem in the context of threads and
> X-Windows?
> 
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> Regards,
> Gregor
> 
> ----------------------------
> 
> Gregor Pavlin
> 
> email: g.pavlin@gmx.at
> Tel.:++43 316 244233
>      ++43 316 289402
> Fax.:++43 316 244243
> 
> Kalsdorferstr. 41,
> A-8073, Feldkirchen bei Graz
> Austria
> 
Hi,

What makes you think that this is NOT an Xserver problem ?
What you describe would be normal if your P450 has an accelerated
video board with an optimised Xserver and your P1000 an unaccelerated
VGA Xserver.

Have you tried to compare Xwindow graphics performance on your
machines ?
Some X benchmark program (xbench) could be useful.

Hope this helps
--
Joseph Bueno
NetClub/Trader.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-admin" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      reply	other threads:[~2002-04-22 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-22 13:33 Performance problem Gregor Pavlin
2002-04-22 14:23 ` Joseph Bueno [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CC41CE1.78F7CDF@trader.com \
    --to=joseph.bueno@trader.com \
    --cc=g.pavlin@gmx.at \
    --cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).