From: Ralph Gesler <rgesler@pacificnet.net>
To: Amod Phadke <to_amod@operamail.com>
Cc: toomai@tiscali.it, linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GMT Timezones
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:46:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E6ED7D0.E98F806F@pacificnet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030312040409.23338.qmail@operamail.com
Amod Phadke wrote:
>
> I think you are looking at the GMT concept wrongly. If we assume GMT as '0' (zero). Then if the sun dawns on central europe 1 hr after it dawns on Greenwitch it is considered as - (minus). If sun dawns on a region before it dawns on Greenwitch it is considered + (plus)
>
> eg. Sun dawns on India 5:30 hrs before it dawans on Greenwitch so Indian time in GMT format will be GMT + 5:30
This is still not a correct explanation. World time zones are numbered
east and west from the Greenwich meridian (0 degrees longitude). Time
zones east of Greenwich are numbered -1 through -12; time zones west of
Greenwich are numbered +1 through 12. The 0th time zone is Greenwich
time.
Time zones are 15 degrees of longitude wide, with the center of the
zones at 15 degree increments around the globe. That is, for example,
the Central European time zone (-1) extends from 7 1/2 degrees to 22
1/2 degrees east centered about the 15 degree east longitude. One
exception to the 15 degree division are the +12/-12 zones which are only
7 1/2 degrees each centered about the International Date line (E180 or
W180).
From the above explanation, it should be seen that the time zone
numbering allows easy conversion from local time to Greenwich time by
adding the zone designation to local time: e.g. 0800 in Rome (-1 zone)
is 0700 in London (0 zone) 0800 +(-1) = 0700. Therefore, when you set
your displayed clock to your local time and provide the zone
designation, the kernel can correctly set the time keeping function to
the correct UTC.
Notice I used UTC _not_ GMT. GMT has not been in general use for a
number of years since the various international standards organizations
established the atomic clock as the standard time reference. The two are
often considered synonymous, but they are not which is the reason for
leap seconds applied irregularly and which can be plus or minus.
Hope this helps.
Ralph Gesler
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-12 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-12 4:04 GMT Timezones Amod Phadke
2003-03-12 6:46 ` Ralph Gesler [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-11 20:49 toomai
2003-03-11 22:03 ` - Luis -
2003-03-12 5:44 ` Glynn Clements
2003-03-12 5:51 ` Glynn Clements
2003-03-12 8:23 ` toomai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E6ED7D0.E98F806F@pacificnet.net \
--to=rgesler@pacificnet.net \
--cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=to_amod@operamail.com \
--cc=toomai@tiscali.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).