From: Donato Diaz <donatodd@itcsoluciones.com>
To: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: NAT Server, SMP box or Single CPU box?
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:22:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41C98318.7050703@itcsoluciones.com> (raw)
Hi,
I have read in different lists that some people are having problem doing
NAT with SMP Servers, due to the way the kernel manage conntrack with
both CPUs.
NAT runs slower on Server SMP with two CPUs?
Is it better a Server with one faster CPU than a server with two CPUs?
I need to buy a NAT Server for +1500 users. I would like to know if an
SMP Server with two CPUs is the best choice.
Any help would be really appreciated.
Thanks all,
Donato.
reply other threads:[~2004-12-22 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41C98318.7050703@itcsoluciones.com \
--to=donatodd@itcsoluciones.com \
--cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).