linux-admin.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* tar vs dump
@ 2006-08-16  2:05 jassduec
  2006-08-16 14:20 ` Scott Taylor
  2006-08-18 22:07 ` Art Wildman
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jassduec @ 2006-08-16  2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-admin, linux-config

Hi All,

Which is more reliable and better for taking full and incremental
backups tar or dump. I like dump more but came across some articles on
the redhat website with references to emails from Linus which state
that dump should not be used for backup on a linux system.

Are there some free backup tools on linux which can take fast and
reliable full and incremental backups? I have been doing backup on
Solaris for years now and never had any issue with ufsdump, ufsrestore
and snapshots. Is it possible to get similar reliability on linux.

TIA

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-18 22:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-16  2:05 tar vs dump jassduec
2006-08-16 14:20 ` Scott Taylor
2006-08-16 15:27   ` Axl Purushu
2006-08-18 22:07 ` Art Wildman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).