From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Taylor <scott@mustang.dctchambers.com>
Subject: Re: system backups with zip disks
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:14:02 -0800
Sender: linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <5.1.1.6.0.20030120134558.01c91768@mustang>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0301201302180.4899-100000@yossarian.aniota.net>
 <Pine.LNX.4.33.0301201422010.311-100000@athame.gmpexpress.net>
 <3E2C58C5.4040707@imagelinks.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.50.0301201302180.4899-100000@yossarian.aniota.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <3E2C6A09.8020308@imagelinks.com>
List-Id: <linux-admin.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-admin <linux-admin@vger.kernel.org>

At 01:28 PM 1/20/03, Jeff Largent wrote:
>This makes no sense,

<snip useless whining about irrelevant examples like bind et al>

>If you have a 100 tape LTO library, sure back it all up.  But remember
>were talking someone using a 100M zip disk.

I thought we were talking about Jude not using zip disks, as a backup 
system, because they are a waste of time.

This e-mail was scanned by RAV Antivirus. (www.ravantivirus.com)