From: "Stephen J. Smoogen" <smooge@gmail.com>
To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux based router for Gigabit traffic
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:39:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80d7e409040823083929746119@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a436d9b040822112563fb6ea7@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 23:55:29 +0530, Anantha Kiran
<ananth.kandukuri@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, we are not using NAPI for this. But we wrote a net_hook module
> which catches the pkts before allowing it to go upper layers.
>
> CPU utilization is 70+ while dropping.
>
> Can u tell me the configuration of your low-end machine.Like PCI-bus,
> and others.
>
Ours are Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz and the motherboard has a PCI-X
chipset on it. We have one Intel fibre optic Gig-E on the 02:01 PCI-X
Bus, and the other on the 03:01 PCI-X bus. I see a limit of about 750
mbits/sec on a fixed load (HTTP accesses for specific boxes), and 400
mbits/sec on a mixed load (ICMP/UDP/TCP). In each case, the maximum
looks to not be the bus speed as much as the soft-irq limit (which is
what mpstat says is using all the resources). The number of packets
per second that ifconfig and other tools gives me looks about the
same. so I am thinking it isnt bus width at the moment as much as
IRQ/packets per second.
The kernels are NAPI compiled.. but I really havent figure out if
using netfilters on these mixed loads 'disables' it.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Professional System Administrator
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-23 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408220858160.1897-100000@bawx.pilosoft.com>
[not found] ` <4128CA84.7000304@redhat.com>
2004-08-22 18:14 ` Linux based router for Gigabit traffic Anantha Kiran
2004-08-22 18:25 ` Anantha Kiran
2004-08-23 15:39 ` Stephen J. Smoogen [this message]
2004-08-22 12:32 Anantha Kiran
2004-08-22 12:49 ` Neil Horman
2004-08-23 5:56 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-23 7:11 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2004-08-23 13:10 ` Adam Lang
2004-08-23 7:58 ` urgrue
2004-08-23 11:17 ` Neil Horman
2004-08-23 11:36 ` urgrue
2004-08-25 7:48 ` Stephen Samuel
2004-08-23 15:31 ` Stephen J. Smoogen
2004-08-22 15:07 ` Matti Aarnio
2004-08-27 18:01 ` neolozer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80d7e409040823083929746119@mail.gmail.com \
--to=smooge@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).