linux-admin.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stephen J. Smoogen" <smooge@gmail.com>
To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux based router for Gigabit traffic
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:39:39 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80d7e409040823083929746119@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a436d9b040822112563fb6ea7@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 23:55:29 +0530, Anantha Kiran
<ananth.kandukuri@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, we are not using NAPI for this. But we wrote a net_hook module
> which catches the pkts before allowing it to go upper layers.
> 
> CPU utilization is 70+ while dropping.
> 
> Can u tell me the configuration of your low-end machine.Like PCI-bus,
> and others.
> 

Ours are Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz and the motherboard has a PCI-X
chipset on it. We have one Intel fibre optic Gig-E on the 02:01 PCI-X
Bus, and the other on the 03:01 PCI-X bus. I see a limit of about 750
mbits/sec on a fixed load (HTTP accesses for specific boxes), and 400
mbits/sec on a mixed load (ICMP/UDP/TCP). In each case, the maximum
looks to not be the bus speed as much as the soft-irq limit (which is
what mpstat says is using all the resources). The number of packets
per second that ifconfig and other tools gives me looks about the
same. so I am thinking it isnt bus width at the moment as much as
IRQ/packets per second.

The kernels are NAPI compiled.. but I really havent figure out if
using netfilters on these mixed loads 'disables' it.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
Professional System Administrator

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-23 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408220858160.1897-100000@bawx.pilosoft.com>
     [not found] ` <4128CA84.7000304@redhat.com>
2004-08-22 18:14   ` Linux based router for Gigabit traffic Anantha Kiran
2004-08-22 18:25 ` Anantha Kiran
2004-08-23 15:39   ` Stephen J. Smoogen [this message]
2004-08-22 12:32 Anantha Kiran
2004-08-22 12:49 ` Neil Horman
2004-08-23  5:56   ` David S. Miller
2004-08-23  7:11     ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2004-08-23 13:10       ` Adam Lang
2004-08-23  7:58     ` urgrue
2004-08-23 11:17     ` Neil Horman
2004-08-23 11:36       ` urgrue
2004-08-25  7:48         ` Stephen Samuel
2004-08-23 15:31   ` Stephen J. Smoogen
2004-08-22 15:07 ` Matti Aarnio
2004-08-27 18:01 ` neolozer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80d7e409040823083929746119@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=smooge@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).